2 added 1 characters in body
source | link

PicasaWeb provides great value for money with large capacity for little money. The integration into Google services is also excellent.

I used to be a big Flickr supporter but their censorship and deletion of accounts without recourse bothered me too much to continue to pay them money as a Pro member.

Another factor is whether you are interested in the Social aspects of photography or not. Flickr is obviously big with the Social aspects, otherothers not so much, but more about storage or pics and presentation.

PicasaWeb has similar Social functions as Flickr but in a very early days version, but it is getting better.

PicasaWeb I think also has better privacy controls than Flickr, but I am sure others will disagree. Sharing is really easy on it to as all you do is share an album or picture with those you can email.

Be cautious with using Facebook for photo storage/sharing as it only keeps a very low resolution version of your pics that can't be downloaded in a good format for say printing should you wish to provide that type of access. However as noted here it does have good people tagging if your friends and family are also on Facebook. These are also available on Flickr and PicasaWeb.

PicasaWeb provides great value for money with large capacity for little money. The integration into Google services is also excellent.

I used to be a big Flickr supporter but their censorship and deletion of accounts without recourse bothered me too much to continue to pay them money as a Pro member.

Another factor is whether you are interested in the Social aspects of photography or not. Flickr is obviously big with the Social aspects, other not so much, but more about storage or pics and presentation.

PicasaWeb has similar Social functions as Flickr but in a very early days version, but it is getting better.

PicasaWeb I think also has better privacy controls than Flickr, but I am sure others will disagree. Sharing is really easy on it to as all you do is share an album or picture with those you can email.

Be cautious with using Facebook for photo storage/sharing as it only keeps a very low resolution version of your pics that can't be downloaded in a good format for say printing should you wish to provide that type of access. However as noted here it does have good people tagging if your friends and family are also on Facebook. These are also available on Flickr and PicasaWeb.

PicasaWeb provides great value for money with large capacity for little money. The integration into Google services is also excellent.

I used to be a big Flickr supporter but their censorship and deletion of accounts without recourse bothered me too much to continue to pay them money as a Pro member.

Another factor is whether you are interested in the Social aspects of photography or not. Flickr is obviously big with the Social aspects, others not so much, but more about storage or pics and presentation.

PicasaWeb has similar Social functions as Flickr but in a very early days version, but it is getting better.

PicasaWeb I think also has better privacy controls than Flickr, but I am sure others will disagree. Sharing is really easy on it to as all you do is share an album or picture with those you can email.

Be cautious with using Facebook for photo storage/sharing as it only keeps a very low resolution version of your pics that can't be downloaded in a good format for say printing should you wish to provide that type of access. However as noted here it does have good people tagging if your friends and family are also on Facebook. These are also available on Flickr and PicasaWeb.

1 Post Made Community Wiki
source | link

PicasaWeb provides great value for money with large capacity for little money. The integration into Google services is also excellent.

I used to be a big Flickr supporter but their censorship and deletion of accounts without recourse bothered me too much to continue to pay them money as a Pro member.

Another factor is whether you are interested in the Social aspects of photography or not. Flickr is obviously big with the Social aspects, other not so much, but more about storage or pics and presentation.

PicasaWeb has similar Social functions as Flickr but in a very early days version, but it is getting better.

PicasaWeb I think also has better privacy controls than Flickr, but I am sure others will disagree. Sharing is really easy on it to as all you do is share an album or picture with those you can email.

Be cautious with using Facebook for photo storage/sharing as it only keeps a very low resolution version of your pics that can't be downloaded in a good format for say printing should you wish to provide that type of access. However as noted here it does have good people tagging if your friends and family are also on Facebook. These are also available on Flickr and PicasaWeb.