Timeline for Is gallery quality possible with a mirrorless camera?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2014 at 22:33 | answer | added | inkista | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 10, 2012 at 13:00 | comment | added | Paul Cezanne | Yes, I did. My goal was to have a camera with my at all times, and the mirror less don't do that. They will not fit in the front pocket of my blue jeans. Check out the Sony, it is THAT good. | |
| Oct 10, 2012 at 12:44 | comment | added | BBking | @Paul Cezanne So, after asking about mirrorless, you decided to go with a compact? The Micro 4/3 lens range is growing now! :) The NEX are a great models, but Micro 4/3 have a big (well, probably the biggest in the mirrorless world) range now. | |
| Oct 10, 2012 at 12:19 | history | edited | Paul Cezanne | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
updated to include the Sony rx100
|
| Dec 5, 2011 at 17:00 | vote | accept | Paul Cezanne | ||
| Dec 3, 2011 at 14:43 | comment | added | mattdm | @Paul, do you follow Kirk Tuck's Visual Science Lab blog? He's a serious pro photographer contemplating these smaller cameras as the future. There's a series of recent posts you might find interesting. Not tagged in any way that I can link to the series, but here's one example: visualsciencelab.blogspot.com/2011/11/… | |
| Dec 3, 2011 at 2:41 | answer | added | Itai | timeline score: 12 | |
| Dec 3, 2011 at 2:20 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPhotos/status/142790330863992832 | ||
| S Dec 2, 2011 at 23:17 | history | suggested | Flimzy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Improve spelling/grammar
|
| Dec 2, 2011 at 23:15 | comment | added | Paul Cezanne | I only sell 11x14, 12x12, and 20x10. | |
| Dec 2, 2011 at 23:14 | comment | added | Staale S | Leica M8 then. They can be had for a song compared to the M9. Hang on a Voigtländer lens and an UV-IR filter, and off you go. 1.3x crop though, and fairly abysmal at high-ISO. Still, it's a Leica. | |
| Dec 2, 2011 at 22:58 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Dec 2, 2011 at 23:17 | |||||
| Dec 2, 2011 at 22:57 | comment | added | mattdm | 20" is the largest you're targetting. What's the minimum size you can accept (or have accepted)? | |
| Dec 2, 2011 at 22:41 | comment | added | Paul Cezanne | Oh I know! The M9 is exactly what I want, but that is so far out of the budget I can't even contemplate it... | |
| Dec 2, 2011 at 22:28 | comment | added | Flimzy | I have never used a range finder, so I don't feel qualified to provide an actual answer, but I believe a digital range finder will give you the quality you want (and high quality glass) in a much smaller package. However, they are very expensive. Last I checked, a Leica M9 was in the US$9000 range. Something lower end may also be good enough for your needs... (one can hope, since they are so much cheaper!) | |
| Dec 2, 2011 at 22:18 | history | asked | Paul Cezanne | CC BY-SA 3.0 |