Timeline for Is there a reason to avoid the Nikon 80-200 f/2.8 on a Nikon D7000?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
23 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2014 at 12:53 | answer | added | Bob Venezio | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 23, 2013 at 5:05 | answer | added | vitalishe | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 11, 2013 at 23:20 | answer | added | Hal Edelson | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 19, 2013 at 3:01 | comment | added | Ygam | it focuses properly on mine too. I guess you just had a faulty D7000 body, as with most others I think | |
| Mar 18, 2013 at 17:55 | comment | added | MikeW | I had two different 80-200mm lenses and they focused wonderfully on a D90, D7000 and D700. | |
| Mar 18, 2013 at 17:49 | comment | added | user17836 | Don't do it!! - The 80-200mm f/2.8 lens (AF-D) does not focus properly on a D7000 even though it worked very well on my D90. I ended up taking my D7000 back to the shop. I wish it had worked properly as it is otherwise a great camera. No probs with supplied lens or my 50mm AF-D - just with the 80-200mm f/2.8 | |
| Feb 7, 2013 at 22:11 | answer | added | Jonathan | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 31, 2013 at 18:05 | answer | added | mtcooper | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 16, 2013 at 6:49 | answer | added | RoD C | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 3, 2011 at 19:39 | answer | added | Jeff Wolski | timeline score: -3 | |
| Nov 11, 2011 at 17:56 | answer | added | Dave Bouvier | timeline score: 4 | |
| Nov 10, 2011 at 8:01 | comment | added | Dan | A number of answers have said that the 80-200 f2.8 is not AF-S, whilst most 80-200s are not, Nikon did make an AF-S version too, from the question it's not entirely clear which @Ygam is talking about. | |
| Nov 9, 2011 at 8:19 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPhotos/status/134183248220782592 | ||
| Nov 8, 2011 at 11:01 | answer | added | Evan Krall | timeline score: 8 | |
| Nov 8, 2011 at 9:54 | answer | added | Imre | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 8, 2011 at 8:11 | answer | added | Dan | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 8, 2011 at 5:05 | answer | added | seanmc | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 8, 2011 at 4:47 | answer | added | mattdm | timeline score: 7 | |
| Nov 8, 2011 at 4:07 | comment | added | mattdm | Yeah, I'm not complaining, just putting the link there for people in the future. :) | |
| Nov 8, 2011 at 4:06 | comment | added | Ygam | yes. I just saw it. However, I wanted an answer from the Nikon owners as this 80-200 lens is quite "special" XD | |
| Nov 8, 2011 at 4:01 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 23 characters in body; edited title
|
| Nov 8, 2011 at 3:59 | comment | added | mattdm | Very similar to this question we just got asking a similar thing for Canon, although not quite with such specificity: photo.stackexchange.com/questions/17028/… | |
| Nov 8, 2011 at 3:56 | history | asked | Ygam | CC BY-SA 3.0 |