Skip to main content
replaced http://upload.wikimedia.org/ with https://upload.wikimedia.org/
Source Link

Why the wide aperture blurs the background more

Let me start with Wikipedia figure:

Depth of field illustration http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Depth_of_field_illustration.svg/498px-Depth_of_field_illustration.svg.pngDepth of field illustration

Above we have a wide open aperture. Only point 2 is in focus. Points 1 and 3 are out of focus. Due to wide aperture, the rays coming from them through different parts of the lens intersect the screen 5 (a film or a digital sensor) in different points. We may also tell that these rays form a point (intersect) before (red) or beyond (green) the screen. The corresponding cones of light intersect with the screen and form an ellipse-like image on the screen. Wider aperture allows for wider cone of light (so it allows to collect more light and blurs more).

Effectively, an out-of-focus point produces a circle of confusion. This is what we can call blur or bokeh.

For smaller aperture below, the rays too far from the center are cut off, so the circle of out-of-focus point is smaller.

If the circle of confusion is smaller than film grain or sensor subpixel, we cannot tell if it is out of focus at all, and then the point appears as in focus even if it is not. So with finite aperture, there is a range of distances which all appear as in focus. The depth of this range is called the depth of field (DoF). It is bigger for smaller apertures.

If the aperture is really, really small, then only the central rays can pass, and we have an infinite depth of field no matter what. Every point, close or far away, is represented as a point on the image. This is how pinhole camera works. Adjustable aperture allows to have anything in between.

How it looks like

At smaller aperture f/32:

f/32 http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/51/Jonquil_flowers_at_f32.jpg/320px-Jonquil_flowers_at_f32.jpgf/32

At larger aperture f/5, an out-of-focus background is blured more:

f/5 http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/01/Jonquil_flowers_at_f5.jpg/320px-Jonquil_flowers_at_f5.jpgf/5

(images are again from Wikipedia)

Why the wide aperture blurs the background more

Let me start with Wikipedia figure:

Depth of field illustration http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Depth_of_field_illustration.svg/498px-Depth_of_field_illustration.svg.png

Above we have a wide open aperture. Only point 2 is in focus. Points 1 and 3 are out of focus. Due to wide aperture, the rays coming from them through different parts of the lens intersect the screen 5 (a film or a digital sensor) in different points. We may also tell that these rays form a point (intersect) before (red) or beyond (green) the screen. The corresponding cones of light intersect with the screen and form an ellipse-like image on the screen. Wider aperture allows for wider cone of light (so it allows to collect more light and blurs more).

Effectively, an out-of-focus point produces a circle of confusion. This is what we can call blur or bokeh.

For smaller aperture below, the rays too far from the center are cut off, so the circle of out-of-focus point is smaller.

If the circle of confusion is smaller than film grain or sensor subpixel, we cannot tell if it is out of focus at all, and then the point appears as in focus even if it is not. So with finite aperture, there is a range of distances which all appear as in focus. The depth of this range is called the depth of field (DoF). It is bigger for smaller apertures.

If the aperture is really, really small, then only the central rays can pass, and we have an infinite depth of field no matter what. Every point, close or far away, is represented as a point on the image. This is how pinhole camera works. Adjustable aperture allows to have anything in between.

How it looks like

At smaller aperture f/32:

f/32 http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/51/Jonquil_flowers_at_f32.jpg/320px-Jonquil_flowers_at_f32.jpg

At larger aperture f/5, an out-of-focus background is blured more:

f/5 http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/01/Jonquil_flowers_at_f5.jpg/320px-Jonquil_flowers_at_f5.jpg

(images are again from Wikipedia)

Why the wide aperture blurs the background more

Let me start with Wikipedia figure:

Depth of field illustration

Above we have a wide open aperture. Only point 2 is in focus. Points 1 and 3 are out of focus. Due to wide aperture, the rays coming from them through different parts of the lens intersect the screen 5 (a film or a digital sensor) in different points. We may also tell that these rays form a point (intersect) before (red) or beyond (green) the screen. The corresponding cones of light intersect with the screen and form an ellipse-like image on the screen. Wider aperture allows for wider cone of light (so it allows to collect more light and blurs more).

Effectively, an out-of-focus point produces a circle of confusion. This is what we can call blur or bokeh.

For smaller aperture below, the rays too far from the center are cut off, so the circle of out-of-focus point is smaller.

If the circle of confusion is smaller than film grain or sensor subpixel, we cannot tell if it is out of focus at all, and then the point appears as in focus even if it is not. So with finite aperture, there is a range of distances which all appear as in focus. The depth of this range is called the depth of field (DoF). It is bigger for smaller apertures.

If the aperture is really, really small, then only the central rays can pass, and we have an infinite depth of field no matter what. Every point, close or far away, is represented as a point on the image. This is how pinhole camera works. Adjustable aperture allows to have anything in between.

How it looks like

At smaller aperture f/32:

f/32

At larger aperture f/5, an out-of-focus background is blured more:

f/5

(images are again from Wikipedia)

Post Merged (destination) from photo.stackexchange.com/questions/15692/…
added 690 characters in body
Source Link
sastanin
  • 5k
  • 1
  • 28
  • 31

Why the wide aperture blurs the background more

Let me start with Wikipedia figure:

Depth of field illustration http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Depth_of_field_illustration.svg/498px-Depth_of_field_illustration.svg.png

Above we have a wide open aperture. Only point 2 is in focus. Points 1 and 3 are out of focus. Due to wide aperture, the rays coming from them through different parts of the lens intersect the screen 5 (a film or a digital sensor) in different points. We may also tell that these rays form a point (intersect) before (red) or beyond (green) the screen. The corresponding cones of light intersect with the screen and form an ellipse-like image on the screen. Wider aperture allows for wider cone of light (so it allows to collect more light and blurs more).

Effectively, an out-of-focus point produces a circle of confusion. This is what we can call blur or bokeh.

For smaller aperture below, the rays too far from the center are cut off, so the circle of out-of-focus point is smaller.

If the circle of confusion is smaller than film grain or sensor subpixel, we cannot tell if it is out of focus at all, and then the point appears as in focus even if it is not. So with finite aperture, there is a range of distances which all appear as in focus. The depth of this range is called the depth of field (DoF). It is bigger for smaller apertures.

If the aperture is really, really small, then only the central rays can pass, and we have an infinite depth of field no matter what. Every point, close or far away, is represented as a point on the image. This is how pinhole camera works. Adjustable aperture allows to have anything in between.

How it looks like

At smaller aperture f/32:

f/32 http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/51/Jonquil_flowers_at_f32.jpg/320px-Jonquil_flowers_at_f32.jpg

At larger aperture f/5, an out-of-focus background is blured more:

f/5 http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/01/Jonquil_flowers_at_f5.jpg/320px-Jonquil_flowers_at_f5.jpg

(images are again from Wikipedia)

Let me start with Wikipedia figure:

Depth of field illustration http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Depth_of_field_illustration.svg/498px-Depth_of_field_illustration.svg.png

Above we have a wide open aperture. Only point 2 is in focus. Points 1 and 3 are out of focus. Due to wide aperture, the rays coming from them through different parts of the lens intersect the screen 5 (a film or a digital sensor) in different points. We may also tell that these rays form a point (intersect) before (red) or beyond (green) the screen. The corresponding cones of light intersect with the screen and form an ellipse-like image on the screen.

Effectively, an out-of-focus point produces a circle of confusion. This is what we can call blur or bokeh.

For smaller aperture below, the rays too far from the center are cut off, so the circle of out-of-focus point is smaller.

If the circle of confusion is smaller than film grain or sensor subpixel, we cannot tell if it is out of focus at all, and then the point appears as in focus even if it is not. So with finite aperture, there is a range of distances which all appear as in focus. The depth of this range is called the depth of field (DoF). It is bigger for smaller apertures.

If the aperture is really, really small, then only the central rays can pass, and we have an infinite depth of field no matter what. Every point, close or far away, is represented as a point on the image. This is how pinhole camera works. Adjustable aperture allows to have anything in between.

Why the wide aperture blurs the background more

Let me start with Wikipedia figure:

Depth of field illustration http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Depth_of_field_illustration.svg/498px-Depth_of_field_illustration.svg.png

Above we have a wide open aperture. Only point 2 is in focus. Points 1 and 3 are out of focus. Due to wide aperture, the rays coming from them through different parts of the lens intersect the screen 5 (a film or a digital sensor) in different points. We may also tell that these rays form a point (intersect) before (red) or beyond (green) the screen. The corresponding cones of light intersect with the screen and form an ellipse-like image on the screen. Wider aperture allows for wider cone of light (so it allows to collect more light and blurs more).

Effectively, an out-of-focus point produces a circle of confusion. This is what we can call blur or bokeh.

For smaller aperture below, the rays too far from the center are cut off, so the circle of out-of-focus point is smaller.

If the circle of confusion is smaller than film grain or sensor subpixel, we cannot tell if it is out of focus at all, and then the point appears as in focus even if it is not. So with finite aperture, there is a range of distances which all appear as in focus. The depth of this range is called the depth of field (DoF). It is bigger for smaller apertures.

If the aperture is really, really small, then only the central rays can pass, and we have an infinite depth of field no matter what. Every point, close or far away, is represented as a point on the image. This is how pinhole camera works. Adjustable aperture allows to have anything in between.

How it looks like

At smaller aperture f/32:

f/32 http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/51/Jonquil_flowers_at_f32.jpg/320px-Jonquil_flowers_at_f32.jpg

At larger aperture f/5, an out-of-focus background is blured more:

f/5 http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/01/Jonquil_flowers_at_f5.jpg/320px-Jonquil_flowers_at_f5.jpg

(images are again from Wikipedia)

added 690 characters in body
Source Link
sastanin
  • 5k
  • 1
  • 28
  • 31

Let me start with Wikipedia figure:

Depth of field illustration http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Depth_of_field_illustration.svg/498px-Depth_of_field_illustration.svg.png

Above we have a wide open aperture. Only point 2 is in focus. Points 1 and 3 are out of focus. Due to wide aperture, the rays coming from them through different parts of the lens intersect the screen 5 (film,a film or a digital sensor) in different points. We may also tell that these rays form a point (intersect) before (red) or beyond (green) the screen. The corresponding cones of light intersect with the screen and form an ellipse-like image on the screen.

Effectively, an out-of-focus point produces a circle of confusion. This is what we can call blur or bokeh.

For smaller aperture below, the rays too far from the center are cut off, so the circle of out-of-focus point is smaller. 

If they arethe circle of confusion is smaller than film grain or sensor subpixel, we cannot tell they areif it is out of focus at all, and then all points 1, 2the point appears as in focus even if it is not. So with finite aperture, 3there is a range of distances which all appear as in focus. This may beThe depth of this range is called a deeper fieldthe depth of focus due tofield (DoF). It is bigger for smaller apertureapertures.

If the aperture is really, really small, then only the central rays can pass, and we have an infinite depth of field no matter what. Every point, close or far away, is represented as a point on the image. This is how pinhole camera works. Adjustable aperture allows to have anything in between.

Let me start with Wikipedia figure:

Depth of field illustration http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Depth_of_field_illustration.svg/498px-Depth_of_field_illustration.svg.png

Above we have a wide open aperture. Only point 2 is in focus. Points 1 and 3 are out of focus. Due to wide aperture, the rays coming from them through different parts of the lens intersect the screen (film, sensor) in different points. Effectively, an out-of-focus point produces a circle of confusion. This is what we can call blur or bokeh.

For smaller aperture below, the rays too far from the center are cut off, so the circle of out-of-focus point is smaller. If they are smaller than film grain or sensor subpixel, we cannot tell they are out of focus at all, and then all points 1, 2, 3 appear as in focus. This may be called a deeper field of focus due to smaller aperture.

If the aperture is really, really small, then only central rays can pass, and we have infinite depth of field no matter what. Every point, close or far away, is represented as a point. This is how pinhole camera works. Adjustable aperture allows to have anything in between.

Let me start with Wikipedia figure:

Depth of field illustration http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Depth_of_field_illustration.svg/498px-Depth_of_field_illustration.svg.png

Above we have a wide open aperture. Only point 2 is in focus. Points 1 and 3 are out of focus. Due to wide aperture, the rays coming from them through different parts of the lens intersect the screen 5 (a film or a digital sensor) in different points. We may also tell that these rays form a point (intersect) before (red) or beyond (green) the screen. The corresponding cones of light intersect with the screen and form an ellipse-like image on the screen.

Effectively, an out-of-focus point produces a circle of confusion. This is what we can call blur or bokeh.

For smaller aperture below, the rays too far from the center are cut off, so the circle of out-of-focus point is smaller. 

If the circle of confusion is smaller than film grain or sensor subpixel, we cannot tell if it is out of focus at all, and then the point appears as in focus even if it is not. So with finite aperture, there is a range of distances which all appear as in focus. The depth of this range is called the depth of field (DoF). It is bigger for smaller apertures.

If the aperture is really, really small, then only the central rays can pass, and we have an infinite depth of field no matter what. Every point, close or far away, is represented as a point on the image. This is how pinhole camera works. Adjustable aperture allows to have anything in between.

added 690 characters in body
Source Link
sastanin
  • 5k
  • 1
  • 28
  • 31
Loading
Source Link
sastanin
  • 5k
  • 1
  • 28
  • 31
Loading