Timeline for Is digital zoom really useful?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2012 at 19:24 | comment | added | Michael Nielsen | On the other hand, a person who really cares about IQ wont be using digital zoom, shooting jpeg, nor worrying about saving a few Kb per image. | |
| Sep 8, 2011 at 23:43 | comment | added | Tomas | @ysap, nope, 2.a says that when using digital zoom, you can safely set your camera to lower quality setting. Which by itself implies that the file size will be lower, disregarding what is said in 2.b. | |
| Sep 8, 2011 at 23:24 | comment | added | ysap | Note I bolded the 2.a - by itself, I don't think the assertion is correct. It is implied in 2.b, though. | |
| Sep 8, 2011 at 19:29 | comment | added | Tomas | @ysap - nope, see 2.b! Moreover, what I meant with 2.a, is that you don't need best quality to save digitally zoomed image - and still you will get better result than using best quality and doing crop and resize in post-process. | |
| Sep 8, 2011 at 18:43 | comment | added | ysap | The arguments seem valid, however, as for 2.a, you will save your digitally zoomed image at best quality and thus should get comparable file size. | |
| Sep 8, 2011 at 15:51 | history | edited | Tomas | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 68 characters in body
|
| Sep 8, 2011 at 13:27 | history | answered | Tomas | CC BY-SA 3.0 |