Timeline for How to compare two DSLR bodies?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2011 at 8:31 | vote | accept | Aquarius_Girl | ||
| Sep 8, 2011 at 12:58 | comment | added | Itai | It's actually squared. 1.5X larger sensor gives 2.25X (1.5^2) shallower depth-of-field. That's why the DOF of tiny sensors is so huge. | |
| Sep 8, 2011 at 6:57 | comment | added | fahad.hasan | A full frame sensor 1.6X/1.5X bigger than an APS-C produces 1.6X/1.5X shallower DOF... am I right? | |
| Sep 8, 2011 at 5:38 | comment | added | Aquarius_Girl | Great Enlightenment @Stan | |
| Sep 8, 2011 at 5:36 | comment | added | user2719 | @Anisha: the DoF is (more-or-less) a function of the aperture and the focal length of the lens, with a larger aperture and a longer focal length (relative to subject distance) giving a shallower depth of field. Since you need to use a longer lens on a larger sensor to get the same subject framing at the same subject distance, you will get a shallower DoF taking the "same" picture at the same aperture. | |
| Sep 8, 2011 at 4:12 | history | edited | ysap | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Sep 8, 2011 at 3:37 | comment | added | Aquarius_Girl |
Hold on, You said: Sensor size (Affects image quality, depth-of-field, field-of-view of your lenses) Now, isn't aperture (depth of field) dependent on lens?
|
|
| Aug 10, 2011 at 9:25 | comment | added | Jari Keinänen | Disclaimer: it's your site. True, it's a great site and most of the regulars know it's yours and deserves the 8 votes +1 from me, but it's nice to have a disclosure nevertheless :-) | |
| Aug 9, 2011 at 14:00 | history | edited | Itai | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Details
|
| Aug 9, 2011 at 13:50 | history | answered | Itai | CC BY-SA 3.0 |