Timeline for How to compare two DSLR bodies?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2011 at 13:11 | comment | added | Juhele | @Jakub: depends on how often do you shoot HDR. I also have Luminance HDR program installed, but I do not use HDR much often so the built-in feature is mostly enough for me and it saves my time. Mine has two levels, but the second one is too strong in my opinion, so I only use the first one. But it is not the feature to persuade me to buy a particular camera. I take it rather as a bonus. | |
| Aug 9, 2011 at 13:01 | comment | added | Jakub Sisak GeoGraphics | Good Answer. I was always unsure about the built-in HDR. Is it really a useful feature? I think even if I had that feature on my camera i would still opt for auto-bracketing and create the final result using a dedicated HDR software where I have full control over the final image. Also, as much as I liked my old Pentax I personally really hated the 4AA batteries setup. | |
| Aug 9, 2011 at 11:49 | comment | added | jwenting | +1 for batteries. Was interested in Sigma's DSLR line until I noticed they used expensive CR123 batteries (which at the time didn't exist in rechargable versions, at least not where I live) which was a dealbreaker (I'd have probably ended up with them had they used LiOn packs or AAs). | |
| Aug 9, 2011 at 7:29 | history | answered | Juhele | CC BY-SA 3.0 |