Timeline for Is it better to transfer photos by removing the memory card or by directly using a data cable?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 26, 2019 at 8:00 | review | Close votes | |||
Aug 31, 2019 at 3:05 | |||||
Aug 15, 2019 at 8:19 | answer | added | user86396 | timeline score: 0 | |
Aug 14, 2019 at 21:21 | answer | added | wildrose | timeline score: 0 | |
Aug 14, 2019 at 19:52 | answer | added | nhan | timeline score: 0 | |
Oct 30, 2017 at 14:30 | answer | added | charlie | timeline score: 3 | |
Dec 28, 2011 at 15:05 | answer | added | user7226 | timeline score: 1 | |
Aug 11, 2011 at 9:44 | vote | accept | Andrei Rînea | ||
Aug 8, 2011 at 13:37 | comment | added | Jakub Sisak GeoGraphics | You will probably get the best download speeds when you use a dedicated card reader built into your computer. With a cable the download can only be as fast as the USB port will allow which may be slower then a high-end card download speeds. In my case it makes a significant difference to plug it dirrectly into a computer. | |
Aug 7, 2011 at 21:20 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPhotos/status/100315525720182784 | ||
Aug 7, 2011 at 19:24 | answer | added | Nir | timeline score: 15 | |
Aug 7, 2011 at 19:06 | comment | added | mattdm | Possible duplicate of photo.stackexchange.com/questions/3345, although as asked that question only covers speed and not other potential issues. | |
Aug 7, 2011 at 18:53 | comment | added | Andrei Rînea | Regarding the 'plug-out/plug-in the card' method I'm a bit worried about the life of the slot's contacts and the card's life too... | |
Aug 7, 2011 at 18:47 | comment | added | Eimantas | I hope this won't be closed as subjective & argumentative. | |
Aug 7, 2011 at 18:46 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
Aug 7, 2011 at 18:29 | history | asked | Andrei Rînea | CC BY-SA 3.0 |