Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 9, 2011 at 14:15 vote accept drolex
Aug 5, 2011 at 21:21 answer added Nir timeline score: 2
Aug 5, 2011 at 20:55 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackPhotos/status/99584436986839040
Aug 5, 2011 at 20:15 comment added dpollitt I see what you are saying. My solution does not attach directly to the lens, because that is not required to achieve a balanced unit. The Wimberley Gimball head in addition to the plate, allow you to place the weight of the camera and lens below their pivot point. It steadies your entire setup so it doesn't flop forward on a tripod. I think that is what you are looking for, and this achieves exactly that.
Aug 5, 2011 at 19:36 comment added drolex Well, the answer just doesn't correspond to what I am looking for. I don't see how using a plate would solve my issue: I still have to find a way to attach the kit to the plate, the plate acts like and advanced tripod head but you still have to balance/stabilize the kit, don't you? Probably I wasn't clear enough, that's why I have amended my question.
Aug 5, 2011 at 17:57 comment added dpollitt I see you have edited your question to specifically rule out my solution. I don't quite understand why you want to rule out a solution that is designed for exactly what you are trying to achieve(mounting a lens without a collar to a tripod).
Aug 5, 2011 at 16:32 history edited mattdm CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 19 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
Aug 5, 2011 at 15:21 answer added smigol timeline score: 12
Aug 5, 2011 at 14:59 history edited drolex CC BY-SA 3.0
more details
Aug 5, 2011 at 14:36 answer added dpollitt timeline score: 6
Aug 5, 2011 at 14:33 answer added Staale S timeline score: 2
Aug 5, 2011 at 14:13 history asked drolex CC BY-SA 3.0