Timeline for How do I tell which point-and-shoot cameras take good low light photos?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
21 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 16, 2014 at 18:53 | answer | added | inkista | timeline score: 0 | |
Oct 20, 2012 at 13:34 | answer | added | j-g-faustus | timeline score: 6 | |
Oct 20, 2012 at 8:41 | comment | added | damned truths | You could try Snapsort's "Recommend" feature. | |
Jul 5, 2012 at 17:05 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
This is the example shopping question from blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/11/qa-is-hard-lets-go-shopping/ . Edit it to better match the suggested ideal.; deleted 3 characters in body; added 4 characters in body
|
Mar 27, 2012 at 20:26 | answer | added | Zds | timeline score: 4 | |
Nov 28, 2011 at 12:36 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
Nov 28, 2011 at 12:36 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
Nov 20, 2011 at 11:19 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPhotos/status/138215004297113600 | ||
Nov 20, 2011 at 10:52 | history | notice added | mattdm | Current answers are outdated | |
Nov 20, 2011 at 10:52 | history | bounty started | mattdm | ||
Nov 20, 2011 at 10:43 | comment | added | mattdm | You might want to consider an off-camera accessory flash which can be triggered remotely. Most of the old-time flashes that could do this are fooled by the preflash used by most digital cameras, but some, like the Metz mecablitz 28 CS-2 digital are specifically designed to work with digital preflash. This will work better than even the best built-in flash, and will work with your current camera plus with whatever you eventually replace it with. | |
Nov 28, 2010 at 14:04 | answer | added | t3mujin | timeline score: -3 | |
Nov 1, 2010 at 20:25 | answer | added | Sajee | timeline score: -2 | |
Nov 1, 2010 at 18:56 | answer | added | Dana | timeline score: -1 | |
Nov 1, 2010 at 18:49 | answer | added | waterlooalex | timeline score: 0 | |
Nov 1, 2010 at 18:43 | comment | added | tito p | Also, try to shoot in RAW photo mode to get better noise reduction in your post production software. I use Adobe Lightroom 3, and noticed a significant improvement over Lightroom 2's noise reduction. I was able to re-process older low-light photos (from the LX3) and enjoy the benefits of the improved noise reduction algorithms. I don't think this would have been possible if I'd shot them as JPEG straight on the camera. | |
Nov 1, 2010 at 18:16 | answer | added | thongtap | timeline score: -2 | |
Jul 25, 2010 at 0:18 | answer | added | Alan | timeline score: 11 | |
Jul 25, 2010 at 0:10 | answer | added | Reid | timeline score: 7 | |
Jul 24, 2010 at 23:33 | answer | added | André Carregal | timeline score: 40 | |
Jul 24, 2010 at 22:51 | history | asked | Vinko Vrsalovic | CC BY-SA 2.5 |