Timeline for Pixel Vignetting
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 13 at 9:21 | comment | added | guialgigu | Thank you @slebetman, is this phenomenon of pixels slightly less bright around the edges evenly or is it randomly distributed. In the first scenario, how could it be differentiated from regular natural or optical vignetting. Under the second scenario, how could it be differentiated from noise/grain? | |
May 13 at 9:21 | comment | added | guialgigu | It is for research purposes @osullic | |
May 13 at 8:47 | comment | added | Philip Kendall♦ | @slebetman Please put your answers in the answers section, even if they're short - thanks. | |
May 13 at 4:36 | comment | added | slebetman |
How can I differentiate it from regular noise - this is unrelated to noise. It is merely the effect that the pixels around the edges of the photo are slightly less bright compared to pixels in the middle of the photo. Generally the effect is so slight you can't see it because the image will contain objects of different colors. However you can maybe see it if you take a picture of an empty perfectly white wall that's perfectly evenly lit.
|
|
May 12 at 18:46 | history | became hot network question | |||
May 12 at 13:17 | answer | added | Steven Kersting | timeline score: 7 | |
May 12 at 9:57 | history | edited | osullic | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
formatting
|
May 12 at 9:55 | comment | added | osullic | Are you actually experiencing a problem in your photography? | |
S May 12 at 7:50 | review | First questions | |||
May 12 at 14:41 | |||||
S May 12 at 7:50 | history | asked | guialgigu | CC BY-SA 4.0 |