Timeline for Is this the right way to shoot in the style of a Hollywood silent movie?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2 at 22:13 | vote | accept | user477203 | ||
| May 1 at 23:06 | history | edited | Rafael | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| May 1 at 15:10 | history | edited | Rafael | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 40 characters in body
|
| May 1 at 15:00 | history | edited | Rafael | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 319 characters in body
|
| May 1 at 14:52 | history | edited | Rafael | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 244 characters in body
|
| May 1 at 14:47 | history | edited | Rafael | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 244 characters in body
|
| May 1 at 14:44 | comment | added | Rafael | I edited the answer complementing my first observation. | |
| May 1 at 14:40 | history | edited | Rafael | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 467 characters in body
|
| May 1 at 14:24 | comment | added | user477203 | The advice about filters, not going too sharp and not fussing too much about focal length makes sense, thanks. I'm kind of having trouble understanding your first bullet point, though. 'I have never seen a bokeh so deep, a DOF so shallow on a silent film that looks like an f1.4 on a 50mm lens. Apertures are much smaller.' As in: the soft-focus 'Pandora's Box' image looks like it was shot with an aperture narrower than f/1.4? Do you have an impression of how that image was captured? | |
| Apr 30 at 16:40 | history | edited | Rafael | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 47 characters in body
|
| Apr 30 at 3:00 | history | edited | Rafael | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 297 characters in body
|
| Apr 30 at 2:54 | history | answered | Rafael | CC BY-SA 4.0 |