Timeline for Technically, why is the out of focus area blurred more when using a bigger aperture?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2018 at 22:46 | comment | added | mattdm | I find the 3D diagram easier to follow. To each their own, I guess — that's one reason the site allows multiple answers. | |
| May 18, 2017 at 10:36 | comment | added | Ruslan | While the image is nice and all, it really doesn't much help understanding what happens. A 2D diagram in the answer by sastanin is much more understandable, although not so fancy. | |
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:43 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://photo.stackexchange.com/ with https://photo.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Nov 20, 2012 at 4:26 | comment | added | jrista | Wow, that new image is awesome! :) I'd vote up again if I could. | |
| Nov 19, 2012 at 21:02 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1347 characters in body
|
| Jun 29, 2011 at 23:01 | vote | accept | Frantisek | ||
| Jun 25, 2011 at 15:58 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 69 characters in body
|
| Jun 25, 2011 at 13:40 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 993 characters in body
|
| Jun 25, 2011 at 13:16 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 762 characters in body
|
| Jun 25, 2011 at 13:06 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 358 characters in body
|
| Jun 25, 2011 at 12:58 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 598 characters in body
|
| Jun 25, 2011 at 12:52 | history | answered | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |