Timeline for Focal length reducer on FF camera (24mm F2)
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2023 at 9:51 | comment | added | Domingo | That's what I needed to know! | |
| Aug 11, 2023 at 9:46 | history | edited | Ralf Kleberhoff | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 804 characters in body
|
| Aug 11, 2023 at 9:44 | vote | accept | Domingo | ||
| Aug 11, 2023 at 9:37 | comment | added | Ralf Kleberhoff | For subject separation, the lens opening in millimeters is what matters. Your lens opening is 12mm, no matter whether you add the reducer or not. With a 35mm focal-length lens, you have this opening at F/2.8. | |
| Aug 11, 2023 at 9:27 | comment | added | Domingo | Thanks a lot for the answer Ralf, I really appreciate it. About the uselessness of this I'm not fully convinced yet. In terms of brightness I agree with you, better to increase the ISO these days. But I need it mostly to increase the effect of subject separation, given by the resulting higher aperture. I need to shoot a subject on a 35mm equivalent FOV, but with maximal subject separation. 35mm F1.4 lenses are expensive and my question was mostly if with this experiment I would achieve similar results, at the expense of using half sensor. | |
| Aug 11, 2023 at 8:24 | history | edited | Ralf Kleberhoff | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
A sentence on compatibility
|
| Aug 11, 2023 at 8:16 | history | answered | Ralf Kleberhoff | CC BY-SA 4.0 |