Timeline for Is the IS of the Canon EF 100-400 4.5-5.6 L IS USM Telephoto Zoom worth the extra £200 over the Canon EF 400 f/5.6 L USM Lens?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2012 at 16:41 | comment | added | Dennis | Hi chuqui. I got Di the 100-400 as an early Christmas present, so far the results have been great. Unfortunately her 7D has developed a fault and is in for repair. Some of her work is on Redbubble (dilouise) although the majority with the previous lenses the latest ones with the 100-400. There is an improvement in clarity at the longer distances. | |
| Dec 31, 2011 at 2:16 | comment | added | chuqui | for what it's worth, I've changed around my camera bag, and I'm reitring the 100-400 in favor of the 70-200 F2.8 with an added 2x teleconverter. I've been using the 300F4+1.4x combo a lot more over time, and the more I do, the more I like it, but I'm going to do some head to head competitions between the 70-200/2X and 300/1.4x to see how the sharpness and focus speed compare. (some notes on why I'm doing this here: bit.ly/taujvl and some early sharpness looks here: bit.ly/rP1vJX). I still love the 100-400, but it was time to do some upgrading. | |
| Jun 17, 2011 at 10:10 | vote | accept | Dennis | ||
| Jun 17, 2011 at 10:10 | |||||
| Jun 17, 2011 at 10:09 | vote | accept | Dennis | ||
| Jun 17, 2011 at 10:09 | |||||
| Jun 15, 2011 at 9:28 | comment | added | Dennis | Thanks chuqui, Looks like you and Jrista are of the same opinion which puts the vote so far at 2 all. I have had a look at your site and certainly you have taken some magnificent photographs. My quest continues. | |
| Jun 15, 2011 at 4:07 | history | answered | chuqui | CC BY-SA 3.0 |