You can't compare these cameras so sample, because:

• first have maximum focal length of 200mm, seconds - 3000mm which mean you can fill the frame with much more distant objects (with the second)
• Because of above you may have problem handheld steady the second camera for long focal lengths. But first camera may win when talk about the Moon
• first camera have much bigger sensor cells which mean in low light (usual situation with wildlife) will give you much less noise
• first camera cost around 2000$, second ~1000$
• none of them (as described) is good for macro photos

You can't compare these cameras so sample, because:

• first have maximum focal length of 200mm, seconds - 3000mm which mean you can fill the frame with much more distant objects (with the second)
• Because of above you may have problem handheld steady the second camera for long focal lengths. But it may win when talk about the Moon
• first camera have much bigger sensor cells which mean in low light (usual situation with wildlife) will give you much less noise
• first camera cost around 2000$, second ~1000$
• none of them (as described) is good for macro photos