Skip to main content
3 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 6, 2011 at 18:16 comment added Roland Compatible is not really that loose a term - an incompatible lens will not let you take a photo adequately at all - like a Nikkor G lens on a film camera since you won't be able to set aperture at all, a compatible lens will allow you to take photos even if you may not get to use all of its features. You'll be able to meter with the F-mount lenses I stated above and you'll be able to set aperture and shutter speed, so I'd consider anything else to be extras, not a matter of compatibility. As it is, I actually find that Amazon should have written "Won't autofocus" instead of incompatible.
Jun 6, 2011 at 18:11 comment added rfusca "Compatible" is kind of the loose term. Its entirely possible for Nikon to add a feature to future lenses without changing the physical mount but still require something on the camera (thats effectively what the focus motor body is).
Jun 6, 2011 at 17:23 history answered Roland CC BY-SA 3.0