Skip to main content
deleted 904 characters in body
Source Link

enter image description here Regardless

Regardless of my browser shows them the same, Photoshop show them different without proofing colors and also different with sRGB internet proofing colors. They only look the same if I only set the unprofiled one (sRGB tagged) to sRGB proof colors. enter image description here

You will be able to calculate the RGB values that PS calculates with this calculator http://www.brucelindbloom.com/index.html?ColorCalculator.html First go from sRGB to XYZ and then to ProPhoto (white D65, gamma 1.8)2nd Edit

Then for the example of Steven Kersting sRGB(0,255,25) is XYZ(0.359330, 0.715854As mentioned by @Tetsujin my RGB Working Space was wrong all this time, 0.128430) andit was ProPhoto  (138.0695, 236.5775 80.7067I was moving things over here and over there), but with and after a 8set my RGB working space as sRGB I could convert directly from the non-bit depth with dont have that precision, actually we dont have decimales soprofiled image to ProPhoto(138, 236, 80) is XYZ(0.358508, 0.712998, 0.126304) and sRGB(9.1773, 254.4782, 21.9759)

Proposal of answerenter image description here

So for my question

There is a cyclical way to convert a image between sRGB and Prophoto and making them to looks the same on the browser?

The answer has three big considerations: What is my native coloryeah because I set the RGB working space to ProPhoto all my profile convertions from non-profiled to ProPhoto got the colors wrong (the one that is told by the video driver toI still wonder the PSreason), Is the source image color unmanaged or does it have color profiles assigned? and What is the format and color depth of the image?. If my native color space is 100% sRGB I could go straight converting profiles. But if I have another color space than 100% sRGB like me with 120% sRGB then a havehad to pay attention if the source image hasassign a colorsRGB profile, if it don't have one I must assign a color profile before the conversion. Now if I have a 8-bit depth LQ JPEG we'll be able to see some color distorsion in the cyclical conversions, but if I have a 16non-bit uncompressed TIFF I may not see significant differences. In theprofiled image below you can see that i managedbefore to replicateconvert to ProPhoto in order to get the conversion on my 120% sRGB workspace (the bottom-right one)correct colors. enter image description here Not a problem in a sRGB working space

enter image description here

enter image description here Regardless of my browser shows them the same, Photoshop show them different without proofing colors and also different with sRGB internet proofing colors. They only look the same if I only set the unprofiled one (sRGB tagged) to sRGB proof colors. enter image description here

You will be able to calculate the RGB values that PS calculates with this calculator http://www.brucelindbloom.com/index.html?ColorCalculator.html First go from sRGB to XYZ and then to ProPhoto (white D65, gamma 1.8)

Then for the example of Steven Kersting sRGB(0,255,25) is XYZ(0.359330, 0.715854, 0.128430) and ProPhoto(138.0695, 236.5775 80.7067), but with a 8-bit depth with dont have that precision, actually we dont have decimales so ProPhoto(138, 236, 80) is XYZ(0.358508, 0.712998, 0.126304) and sRGB(9.1773, 254.4782, 21.9759)

Proposal of answer

So for my question

There is a cyclical way to convert a image between sRGB and Prophoto and making them to looks the same on the browser?

The answer has three big considerations: What is my native color space (the one that is told by the video driver to the PS), Is the source image color unmanaged or does it have color profiles assigned? and What is the format and color depth of the image?. If my native color space is 100% sRGB I could go straight converting profiles. But if I have another color space than 100% sRGB like me with 120% sRGB then a have to pay attention if the source image has a color profile, if it don't have one I must assign a color profile before the conversion. Now if I have a 8-bit depth LQ JPEG we'll be able to see some color distorsion in the cyclical conversions, but if I have a 16-bit uncompressed TIFF I may not see significant differences. In the image below you can see that i managed to replicate the conversion on my 120% sRGB workspace (the bottom-right one). enter image description here

enter image description here

Regardless of my browser shows them the same, Photoshop show them different without proofing colors and also different with sRGB internet proofing colors. They only look the same if I only set the unprofiled one (sRGB tagged) to sRGB proof colors. enter image description here

2nd Edit

As mentioned by @Tetsujin my RGB Working Space was wrong all this time, it was ProPhoto  (I was moving things over here and over there) and after a set my RGB working space as sRGB I could convert directly from the non-profiled image to ProPhoto.

enter image description here

So yeah because I set the RGB working space to ProPhoto all my profile convertions from non-profiled to ProPhoto got the colors wrong (I still wonder the reason). I had to assign a sRGB profile to the non-profiled image before to convert to ProPhoto in order to get the correct colors. Not a problem in a sRGB working space

enter image description here

added 212 characters in body
Source Link
  • My main display is a Huion Kamvas 13 with 120% sRGB according to the manufacturer.
  • Because of that the image on the ProPhoto space won't look the same as the sRGB one without proofing colors.
  • The original image tagged with sRGB doesn't have a ICC profile, but by default the browser will assume it as sRGB, not. That's useless with mostly all the screens (100%-sRGB) but for my 120%-sRGB screen is useful because thanks to that my browser won't over-saturate the image. Not the same with Photoshop, actually, PS will over-saturate the non-profiled image.

Regardlessenter image description here Regardless of my browser shows them the same, Photoshop show them different without proofing colors and also different with sRGB internet proofing colors. They only look the same if I only set the unprofiled one (sRGB tagged) to sRGB proof colors. enter image description hereenter image description here

  • For the unmanaged image with no proof colors I guess that PS stretch the RGB colors (oversaturating them) to my larger 120% sRGB space right?
  • For the ProPhoto with sRGB proof colors I guess is like to have double conversion first from ProPhoto to 120% sRGB and than to 100% rgb. That implies that in a 100% rgb that image will look right Isn't it? enter image description here
  • My main display is a Huion Kamvas 13 with 120% sRGB according to the manufacturer.
  • Because of that the image on the ProPhoto space won't look the same as the sRGB one without proofing colors.
  • The original image tagged with sRGB doesn't have a ICC profile, but by default the browser will assume it as sRGB, not the same with Photoshop.

Regardless of my browser shows them the same, Photoshop show them different without proofing colors and also different with sRGB internet proofing colors. They only look the same if I only set the unprofiled one (sRGB tagged) to sRGB proof colors. enter image description here

  • For the unmanaged image with no proof colors I guess that PS stretch the RGB colors (oversaturating them) to my larger 120% sRGB space right?
  • For the ProPhoto with sRGB proof colors I guess is like to have double conversion first from ProPhoto to 120% sRGB and than to 100% rgb. That implies that in a 100% rgb that image will look right Isn't it? enter image description here
  • My main display is a Huion Kamvas 13 with 120% sRGB according to the manufacturer.
  • Because of that the image on the ProPhoto space won't look the same as the sRGB one without proofing colors.
  • The original image tagged with sRGB doesn't have a ICC profile, but by default the browser will assume it as sRGB. That's useless with mostly all the screens (100%-sRGB) but for my 120%-sRGB screen is useful because thanks to that my browser won't over-saturate the image. Not the same with Photoshop, actually, PS will over-saturate the non-profiled image.

enter image description here Regardless of my browser shows them the same, Photoshop show them different without proofing colors and also different with sRGB internet proofing colors. They only look the same if I only set the unprofiled one (sRGB tagged) to sRGB proof colors. enter image description here

  • For the unmanaged image with no proof colors I guess that PS stretch the RGB colors (oversaturating them) to my larger 120% sRGB space right?
  • For the ProPhoto with sRGB proof colors I guess is like to have double conversion first from ProPhoto to 120% sRGB and than to 100% rgb. That implies that in a 100% rgb that image will look right Isn't it?
improved formatting, and posible answer
Source Link

Converting from sRGB to ProPhoto & vice versa on Photoshop (with a 120% sRGB screen)

enter image description hereImg 1 This is just academic:
I want to find a cyclical way to convert from sRGB to ProPhoto and vice-versa on Photoshop.

Edit

To consider:

  • My main display is a Huion Kamvas 13 with 120% sRGB according to the manufacturer.
  • Because of that the image on the ProPhoto space won't look the same as the sRGB one without proofing colors.
  • The original image tagged with sRGB doesn't have a ICC profile, but by default the browser will assume it as sRGB, not the same with Photoshop.

Regardless of my browser shows them the same, Photoshop show them different without proofing colors and also different with sRGB internet proofing colors. They only look the same if I only set the unprofiled one (sRGB tagged) to sRGB proof colors. enter image description here

  • For the unmanaged image with no proof colors I guess that PS stretch the RGB colors (oversaturating them) to my larger 120% sRGB space right?
  • For the ProPhoto with sRGB proof colors I guess is like to have double conversion first from ProPhoto to 120% sRGB and than to 100% rgb. That implies that in a 100% rgb that image will look right Isn't it? enter image description here

After a kind of laboratory a realized (I think) that my 120% sRGB screen (or driver) tells to PS to operates the transformations with that space when converting color profiles as you can see in the "sRGB Converted to ProPhoto" (1st row, 2nd col) resulting in wrong colors. But if I tell to PS that the unmanaged image is on the sRGB space assigning it a sRGB profile before I convert to the ProPhoto space, PS do the works correcly enter image description here

Now I want to go back from ProPhoto to sRGB enter image description here Here you an see that if I just assign a sRGB profile to the ProPhoto (sRGB, sRGB assigned, Converted to ProPhoto) image the colors get borked as @Tetsujin mentioned. But if a converted to sRGB and then remove the color management I'm able to get back a image virtualy equal to the original sRGB one

You will be able to calculate the RGB values that PS calculates with this calculator http://www.brucelindbloom.com/index.html?ColorCalculator.html First go from sRGB to XYZ and then to ProPhoto (white D65, gamma 1.8)

Then for the example of Steven Kersting sRGB(0,255,25) is XYZ(0.359330, 0.715854, 0.128430) and ProPhoto(138.0695, 236.5775 80.7067), but with a 8-bit depth with dont have that precision, actually we dont have decimales so ProPhoto(138, 236, 80) is XYZ(0.358508, 0.712998, 0.126304) and sRGB(9.1773, 254.4782, 21.9759)

Proposal of answer

So for my question

There is a cyclical way to convert a image between sRGB and Prophoto and making them to looks the same on the browser?

The answer has three big considerations: What is my native color space (the one that is told by the video driver to the PS), Is the source image color unmanaged or does it have color profiles assigned? and What is the format and color depth of the image?. If my native color space is 100% sRGB I could go straight converting profiles. But if I have another color space than 100% sRGB like me with 120% sRGB then a have to pay attention if the source image has a color profile, if it don't have one I must assign a color profile before the conversion. Now if I have a 8-bit depth LQ JPEG we'll be able to see some color distorsion in the cyclical conversions, but if I have a 16-bit uncompressed TIFF I may not see significant differences. In the image below you can see that i managed to replicate the conversion on my 120% sRGB workspace (the bottom-right one). enter image description here

Consedirations

You will be able to calculate the RGB values that PS calculates with this calculator. First go from sRGB to XYZ and then to ProPhoto (white D65, gamma 1.8). Then for the example of @Steven Kersting, sRGB(0,255,25) is XYZ(0.359330, 0.715854, 0.128430) and ProPhoto(138.0695, 236.5775 80.7067), but with a 8-bit depth we dont have that precision, actually, we don't have decimals, so for PS to get back, it will be ProPhoto(138, 236, 80) that is XYZ(0.358508, 0.712998, 0.126304) and is sRGB(9.1773, 254.4782, 21.9759) and of course this will be rounded. But this scenario is idealistic because as mention @doug if you set the dither option you will have some kind variation to maintain the average and reducing the error, and even better results if you have a 16-bit color depth

Converting from sRGB to ProPhoto & vice versa on Photoshop

enter image description here This is just academic:
I want to find a cyclical way to convert from sRGB to ProPhoto and vice-versa on Photoshop.

Converting from sRGB to ProPhoto & vice versa on Photoshop (with a 120% sRGB screen)

Img 1 This is just academic:
I want to find a cyclical way to convert from sRGB to ProPhoto and vice-versa on Photoshop.

Edit

To consider:

  • My main display is a Huion Kamvas 13 with 120% sRGB according to the manufacturer.
  • Because of that the image on the ProPhoto space won't look the same as the sRGB one without proofing colors.
  • The original image tagged with sRGB doesn't have a ICC profile, but by default the browser will assume it as sRGB, not the same with Photoshop.

Regardless of my browser shows them the same, Photoshop show them different without proofing colors and also different with sRGB internet proofing colors. They only look the same if I only set the unprofiled one (sRGB tagged) to sRGB proof colors. enter image description here

  • For the unmanaged image with no proof colors I guess that PS stretch the RGB colors (oversaturating them) to my larger 120% sRGB space right?
  • For the ProPhoto with sRGB proof colors I guess is like to have double conversion first from ProPhoto to 120% sRGB and than to 100% rgb. That implies that in a 100% rgb that image will look right Isn't it? enter image description here

After a kind of laboratory a realized (I think) that my 120% sRGB screen (or driver) tells to PS to operates the transformations with that space when converting color profiles as you can see in the "sRGB Converted to ProPhoto" (1st row, 2nd col) resulting in wrong colors. But if I tell to PS that the unmanaged image is on the sRGB space assigning it a sRGB profile before I convert to the ProPhoto space, PS do the works correcly enter image description here

Now I want to go back from ProPhoto to sRGB enter image description here Here you an see that if I just assign a sRGB profile to the ProPhoto (sRGB, sRGB assigned, Converted to ProPhoto) image the colors get borked as @Tetsujin mentioned. But if a converted to sRGB and then remove the color management I'm able to get back a image virtualy equal to the original sRGB one

You will be able to calculate the RGB values that PS calculates with this calculator http://www.brucelindbloom.com/index.html?ColorCalculator.html First go from sRGB to XYZ and then to ProPhoto (white D65, gamma 1.8)

Then for the example of Steven Kersting sRGB(0,255,25) is XYZ(0.359330, 0.715854, 0.128430) and ProPhoto(138.0695, 236.5775 80.7067), but with a 8-bit depth with dont have that precision, actually we dont have decimales so ProPhoto(138, 236, 80) is XYZ(0.358508, 0.712998, 0.126304) and sRGB(9.1773, 254.4782, 21.9759)

Proposal of answer

So for my question

There is a cyclical way to convert a image between sRGB and Prophoto and making them to looks the same on the browser?

The answer has three big considerations: What is my native color space (the one that is told by the video driver to the PS), Is the source image color unmanaged or does it have color profiles assigned? and What is the format and color depth of the image?. If my native color space is 100% sRGB I could go straight converting profiles. But if I have another color space than 100% sRGB like me with 120% sRGB then a have to pay attention if the source image has a color profile, if it don't have one I must assign a color profile before the conversion. Now if I have a 8-bit depth LQ JPEG we'll be able to see some color distorsion in the cyclical conversions, but if I have a 16-bit uncompressed TIFF I may not see significant differences. In the image below you can see that i managed to replicate the conversion on my 120% sRGB workspace (the bottom-right one). enter image description here

Consedirations

You will be able to calculate the RGB values that PS calculates with this calculator. First go from sRGB to XYZ and then to ProPhoto (white D65, gamma 1.8). Then for the example of @Steven Kersting, sRGB(0,255,25) is XYZ(0.359330, 0.715854, 0.128430) and ProPhoto(138.0695, 236.5775 80.7067), but with a 8-bit depth we dont have that precision, actually, we don't have decimals, so for PS to get back, it will be ProPhoto(138, 236, 80) that is XYZ(0.358508, 0.712998, 0.126304) and is sRGB(9.1773, 254.4782, 21.9759) and of course this will be rounded. But this scenario is idealistic because as mention @doug if you set the dither option you will have some kind variation to maintain the average and reducing the error, and even better results if you have a 16-bit color depth

added 8 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
edited title
Link
Tetsujin
  • 23.4k
  • 3
  • 47
  • 100
Loading
broke into more legible paras
Source Link
Tetsujin
  • 23.4k
  • 3
  • 47
  • 100
Loading
Source Link
Loading