Timeline for What are some common gotchas and missed capabilities migrating from compacts to DSLRs
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2011 at 19:35 | vote | accept | bob | ||
| Jul 3, 2011 at 19:35 | |||||
| May 25, 2011 at 8:09 | vote | accept | bob | ||
| Jul 3, 2011 at 19:35 | |||||
| May 21, 2011 at 21:21 | comment | added | bob | I suppose the question could be edited to make it less about my specific situation, but I don't think it is very subjective. It meets all the guidelines with the possible exception of #5. | |
| May 21, 2011 at 20:50 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPhotos/status/72041697114206208 | ||
| May 20, 2011 at 18:49 | comment | added | mattdm | When they must be somewhat subjective, individual but intended-to-be-comprehensive answers are best. Collaborative editing of answers with no individual ownership doesn't improve them. If it's not subjective, CW is great for list-based answers, but if it is subjective, opinions should stay attached to the people they belong to. Take a look at the list of guidelines here: blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/09/good-subjective-bad-subjective | |
| May 20, 2011 at 15:48 | comment | added | bwDraco | This question is somewhat subjective but useful, and an answer would be a list of possible problems that would benefit from collaborative editing, especially when there are answers that are intended to be added to one master answer. Flagging for moderator to make community wiki. | |
| May 20, 2011 at 15:46 | answer | added | Luciano | timeline score: 2 | |
| May 20, 2011 at 13:34 | answer | added | coneslayer | timeline score: 13 | |
| May 20, 2011 at 10:07 | answer | added | Matt Grum | timeline score: 18 | |
| May 20, 2011 at 9:22 | history | asked | bob | CC BY-SA 3.0 |