Timeline for In 2019, do any OSS/IBIS implementations offer some degree of subject tracking?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2019 at 23:40 | review | Close votes | |||
| Oct 16, 2019 at 4:15 | |||||
| Oct 1, 2019 at 10:46 | comment | added | ths | AFAIK you can't use the sensor data while you're taking an image. Stabilization systems use gyroscopic sensors. | |
| Sep 29, 2019 at 12:10 | comment | added | scottbb♦ | @vclaw that would certainly help increase the exposure duration and/or tracking range (travel distance of subject), allowing for at least somewhat faster moving subjects. But gimbal tracking won't be able to be nearly as precise as either OSS or IBIS in accurately following the subject. That is, the closed loop tracking is faster and more precise when the loop is smaller, and the controller has to deal with orders of magnitude less inertia. I'd love to see a combined IBIS+gimbal system for cameras, at a prosumer price point. | |
| Sep 29, 2019 at 9:04 | comment | added | vclaw | What about some sort of gimbal with object tracking? | |
| Sep 29, 2019 at 7:06 | answer | added | Michael C | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 28, 2019 at 18:47 | history | asked | rackandboneman | CC BY-SA 4.0 |