Timeline for How do the Tamron and Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 lenses compare for photographing high school sports?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2018 at 10:00 | comment | added | xiota | You can compare test images. | |
| Nov 2, 2018 at 4:18 | comment | added | Michael C | Bryan Carnathan's review of the Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG OS HSM includes numerous comparisons to both the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS II and the Tamron SP 70-200mm F/2.8 Di VC USD. In terms of pure image quality, the Tamron lens he tested was a little better than the Sigma lens he tested. That seems to be the general consensus I've seen from many reviewers. Other factors may be equally or more important to you, though. | |
| Nov 1, 2018 at 19:08 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 3 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
| Nov 1, 2018 at 17:27 | comment | added | OnBreak. | Responding to your answer/comment - lenses are so varied across even a single brand that one cannot really compare brands (with some exceptions, as always). Tamron and Sigma both have fantastic lenses in their lineup and not-so-good lenses as well. The brand should have little impact on your decision. So, I restate: What features have you most concerned/confused? Which are you leaning toward and why? | |
| Nov 1, 2018 at 16:28 | answer | added | Shaun of the Dead | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 1, 2018 at 15:57 | comment | added | Lisa W | I just would like to know what brand is more preferred? | |
| Nov 1, 2018 at 14:56 | comment | added | OnBreak. | Do you have the option of renting either? What features have you most concerned/confused? Which are you leaning toward and why? | |
| Nov 1, 2018 at 14:55 | review | Close votes | |||
| Nov 19, 2018 at 3:05 | |||||
| Nov 1, 2018 at 14:10 | history | asked | Lisa W | CC BY-SA 4.0 |