Timeline for Too short exposure times in Darkroom
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2018 at 0:37 | history | edited | Stan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Trivial word change
|
| Oct 5, 2018 at 4:42 | comment | added | Stan | What is the size (wattage) of the bulb in your enlarger head? Is it the proper size? Are the white borders dark in the picture you show or is there another reason the borders appear dark such as a shadow? | |
| Oct 4, 2018 at 15:34 | comment | added | Stan | Alan suggests looking at your paper developer concentration. Also the temperature should be 20°C (68°F) for all your solutions. | |
| Oct 4, 2018 at 13:56 | comment | added | OnBreak. | @Alaskaman seems to me op is using expose and develop interchangeably. As I took it, we don't know what the dev time is, but the exposure is ~8" at f/11. Maybe that's the confusion here? | |
| Oct 4, 2018 at 6:25 | comment | added | Alaska Man | When developing black-and-white prints you need to leave the print in the developer for the required amount of time( at least 90 seconds to two minutes). Did you do a test strip to determine the proper exposure time? Do you know how to do a test strip? | |
| Oct 4, 2018 at 4:19 | answer | added | Alan Marcus | timeline score: 2 | |
| Oct 4, 2018 at 3:23 | comment | added | userlieven | I use the Durst M605 enlarger. The development of the film was done in a Labo. So i don't know about that. What do you mean by are they thin or optimally dense? | |
| Oct 4, 2018 at 3:06 | comment | added | OnBreak. | What enlarger are you using? How's your exposure and development of your negative? Are they thin or optimally dense? | |
| Oct 4, 2018 at 2:58 | history | asked | userlieven | CC BY-SA 4.0 |