Timeline for What printing solution will best provide me with high quality, archival prints with a consistent workflow?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 7, 2018 at 23:15 | answer | added | xiota | timeline score: 2 | |
Sep 7, 2018 at 23:14 | comment | added | xiota | This question has too many different issues and questions embedded into it. | |
Sep 7, 2018 at 17:46 | answer | added | OnBreak. | timeline score: 1 | |
Aug 27, 2018 at 18:35 | comment | added | Daniele Procida | Speed's unimportant to me. I won't be doing any colour printing in the darkroom. | |
Aug 27, 2018 at 18:34 | history | edited | Daniele Procida | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 30 characters in body
|
Aug 27, 2018 at 18:07 | comment | added | OnBreak. | How important is speed to you? For example, I'm very satisfied with my wet scans on an Epson V850 and decently happy with prints from a Canon Pro10 - but the use of either is neither cheap nor expedient. I like mpix or any lab using the same tech for fast, quality prints. Also - where are you at on the darkroom vs scan&print choice? | |
Aug 27, 2018 at 15:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhotos/status/1034093197537042432 | ||
Aug 27, 2018 at 14:10 | history | edited | Daniele Procida | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
Aug 27, 2018 at 14:05 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
Aug 27, 2018 at 11:21 | history | edited | Daniele Procida | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 24 characters in body
|
Aug 27, 2018 at 10:15 | history | asked | Daniele Procida | CC BY-SA 4.0 |