meta user
network profile
| bio | website | iathao.com |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year |
| seen | Feb 20 at 18:40 | |
| stats | profile views | 12 |
|
Feb 20 |
comment |
Which of these lenses allows a greater amount of light through at f/1.4: Canon 35mm f/1.4 or Sigma 35mm f/1.4? @MichaelClark title edited ) |
|
Feb 19 |
comment |
Which of these lenses allows a greater amount of light through at f/1.4: Canon 35mm f/1.4 or Sigma 35mm f/1.4?ens performance doesn't depend on the amount of light well, that's something new to me ) |
|
Feb 19 |
comment |
Which of these lenses allows a greater amount of light through at f/1.4: Canon 35mm f/1.4 or Sigma 35mm f/1.4? @MichaelClark Ziess doesn't have AF, otherwise we wouldn't have this discussion and I've already bought Zeiss 35mm f/1.4. What I meant is that Zeiss lens did let much more light through. Canon 85mm f/1.2 is definitely brighter than the Zeiss f/2 though |
|
Feb 17 |
comment |
Which of these lenses allows a greater amount of light through at f/1.4: Canon 35mm f/1.4 or Sigma 35mm f/1.4? it's a shame though. because according to this test: facebook.com/… the bokeh on canon can get REALLY ugly ( |
|
Feb 17 |
comment |
Which of these lenses allows a greater amount of light through at f/1.4: Canon 35mm f/1.4 or Sigma 35mm f/1.4? well, i'm going to be using it at f/1.4 a lot. no point in buying a f/1.4 lens to use it at f/2. And the deal breaker for me is that it appears to eat less light than the canon as I feared (this is extremely important to me) |
|
Feb 17 |
comment |
Which of these lenses allows a greater amount of light through at f/1.4: Canon 35mm f/1.4 or Sigma 35mm f/1.4? well, it's about time, and for 50mm f/1.2 too. |
|
Feb 17 |
comment |
Which of these lenses allows a greater amount of light through at f/1.4: Canon 35mm f/1.4 or Sigma 35mm f/1.4? well, this looks interesting: amazon.com/review/R90LRWO9H0HO8/… On the copies I have, the sigma offers no increase in sharpness or image quality when compared to the canon, a substantial step or two down in terms of vignetting, and requires approximately 1/3 of a stop slower shutter speed to expose the photo equivalently to the canon. Looks like a deal breaker for me (( |
|
Feb 17 |
comment |
Which of these lenses allows a greater amount of light through at f/1.4: Canon 35mm f/1.4 or Sigma 35mm f/1.4? hehe. as canon proved by producing plasticky version of 24-70 which costs twice as much ) |
|
Feb 17 |
comment |
Which of these lenses allows a greater amount of light through at f/1.4: Canon 35mm f/1.4 or Sigma 35mm f/1.4? also, what worries me is that I don't understand why Sigma is nearly twice as cheap as Canon. It's not Canon, that's $200 discount. Where are the other $300? |
|
Feb 17 |
comment |
Which of these lenses allows a greater amount of light through at f/1.4: Canon 35mm f/1.4 or Sigma 35mm f/1.4?The oft rumored EF 35 f/1.4L II is being talked about again. We’re told an announcement for the new “L” prime will only happen once the new EF 24-70 f/2.8L II begun shipping in decent quantity.
That would put the announcement sometime in 2012 with availability probably being in early 2013. One patent for the optical forumla has been around for a while. The rumor has come and gone many times already |
|
Feb 17 |
comment |
Which of these lenses allows a greater amount of light through at f/1.4: Canon 35mm f/1.4 or Sigma 35mm f/1.4? check this out: forums.dpreview.com/forums/post/50700998 some focus problems in bad light |
|
Feb 17 |
comment |
Which of these lenses allows a greater amount of light through at f/1.4: Canon 35mm f/1.4 or Sigma 35mm f/1.4? ) ok. what I'm deciding between is canon L and sigma lenses, and to me canon f/2 won't ever out-perform the canon L lens, so it's out of the equation. I simply don't think it's up to the task. I'm not considering sigma because it's cheaper, only because it might be better |
|
Feb 17 |
comment |
Which of these lenses allows a greater amount of light through at f/1.4: Canon 35mm f/1.4 or Sigma 35mm f/1.4? I'm personally of an opinion that no amount of IS can compensate for reduced aperture in a lens. And the f/2 is a non-L lens, meaning that the quality of the image is going to suffer. Thanks, but no, thank you |
|
Oct 22 |
comment |
What lenses can I mount on Canon that will give me a different, exotic look for portrait photography? I've made a comparison between Zeiss 100mm and Canon 85mm based on one of my photo shootings: photo.iathao.com/reviews/zeiss_100mm_vs_canon_85mm.pdf . For the end result: when using Canon 85mm, you get the journal look, while when using Zeiss 100mm, you get the movie look. Both are exceptional |
|
Oct 21 |
comment |
What lenses can I mount on Canon that will give me a different, exotic look for portrait photography? the Elmarit 180mm looks promising. Thanks! Any idea on how it compares to 70-200 ii in terms of IQ? |
|
Oct 21 |
comment |
What lenses can I mount on Canon that will give me a different, exotic look for portrait photography? My main problem with R-mount lenses is, that I don't feel like they are better than available Canon lenses. For example, for me, noctilux looks distinctively better than canon 50mm f/1.2, while none of the summilux f/1.4 (avaliable with R-mount) lenses matches it |
|
Oct 20 |
comment |
What lenses can I mount on Canon that will give me a different, exotic look for portrait photography? They are excellent. But they can't be mounted on canon. I'll love to buy M10 one day, but I'm not there yet |
|
Oct 18 |
comment |
Canon 50mm lens: f/1.2 L or f/1.4? Alternative brands? my vote's for zeiss. at f/1.4 it's darker than canon f/1.2 (if you care for those things), but the colors are awesome. I have zeiss 100mm f/2, and did compare it to the canon 85mm f/1.2 for portrait photography. Compared to zeiss, 85mm's colors looked dull and uninteresting |
|
Oct 10 |
comment |
How do I get good colors when taking pictures in the city at night? @Jakub I usually set it to Auto |
|
Oct 10 |
comment |
How do I get good colors when taking pictures in the city at night? it's always row. to me, shooting jpeg is like shooting polaroid. You are stuck with what you've got |
