meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 1 month |
| seen | Apr 1 at 22:00 | |
| stats | profile views | 19 |
|
Apr 27 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Mar 28 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Jan 29 |
comment |
Why aren't photos from my Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 as sharp as I expect? taylorhustonphotography.com/Events/The-Rose-Soul-to-Seoul/… |
|
Jan 29 |
comment |
Why aren't photos from my Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 as sharp as I expect? I have both the 35mm and 50mm f/1.8. I shoot them wide open and get great results. But those are both fantastic lenses. I bought the Tokina because there wasn't a lot of fast, ultrawide DX options. In retrospect I should have gotten something else I think. I got it mainly for the f/2.8, but I think investing the money in a good flash would have been better. |
|
Jan 29 |
asked | Why aren't photos from my Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 as sharp as I expect? |
|
Jan 4 |
accepted | How can I be sure a lens will autofocus on my Nikon D5000? |
|
Jan 4 |
accepted | Why would a serious photographer buy a lens slower than f/2.8? |
|
Dec 5 |
accepted | Why is my D5000 not saving pictures? |
|
Dec 5 |
answered | Why is my D5000 not saving pictures? |
|
Dec 5 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Dec 4 |
awarded | Teacher |
|
Nov 29 |
comment |
Sigma 150-500 for wildlife? I thought about the 80-400, but at the end of the day it is about $400 more expensive (new, though a quick look at Amazon shows some used for as cheap as $800), less long end range, and only slightly faster. If 300mm is a long enough range that leaves me open to several cheaper options, some under $500, though I kind of think I'd like to have the 500mm, even if I rarely use it, just in case? |
|
Nov 29 |
awarded | Commentator |
|
Nov 29 |
comment |
Sigma 150-500 for wildlife? Yeah but some reviews have told me that the 150-500 is a little bit sharper, and I don't think I would need the extra range/weight/price of the 50-500. |
|
Nov 29 |
asked | Sigma 150-500 for wildlife? |
|
Nov 29 |
answered | Is there a reason to keep both a 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G and a 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G lens for my Nikon D5100? |
|
Nov 19 |
revised |
Why would a serious photographer buy a lens slower than f/2.8? added 389 characters in body |
|
Nov 19 |
comment |
Why would a serious photographer buy a lens slower than f/2.8? How much image quality are you sacrificing for that reduction in weight and cost? |
|
Nov 19 |
asked | Why would a serious photographer buy a lens slower than f/2.8? |
|
Oct 12 |
asked | Has anyone bought from BestPricePhoto.com? |
