network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 10 months |
| seen | Aug 25 '11 at 18:32 | |
| stats | profile views | 5 |
|
Oct 15 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Aug 25 |
comment |
Why does Photoshop show my JPEG files unusually large? You guys are great, thanks for the time and effort to pound this into my brain. I believe I understand now. |
|
Aug 25 |
comment |
Why does Photoshop show my JPEG files unusually large? Ok, thanks to everyone who has explained this to me. But I still don't get it why a jpeg direct from the camera is opened at the same size as a tiff direct from the camera. |
|
Aug 25 |
comment |
Why does Photoshop show my JPEG files unusually large? The screen shot maybe explains the situation better. The info on the images shows them the jpeg at 4.2mb and the tiff as 35.8, yet the image size for the jpeg in CS3 shows 34.9mb for the same jpeg image. This is the part I don't get. I starting to feel like a complete idiot on this. |
|
Aug 25 |
comment |
Why does Photoshop show my JPEG files unusually large? /Users/owen/Desktop/Picture 2.png |
|
Aug 25 |
comment |
Why does Photoshop show my JPEG files unusually large? But doesn't the camera compress the image when you shoot a jpeg? The amount of compression dependent on whether you want fine/basic quality or large/medium/small image size. I understand that you can apply an additional amount of compression when you chose a quality setting when you save the image. Why would the camera record a jpeg image at the same file size as a tiff, at least as interpreted by CS3? |
|
Aug 25 |
awarded | Student |
|
Aug 25 |
asked | Why does Photoshop show my JPEG files unusually large? |
