Time to be with your loved ones

Time to be with loved ones

by sat

submit your photo


Hall of Fame
View past winners from this year

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

491 reputation
28
bio website tempel.org
location Munich, Germany
age 49
visits member for 2 years, 11 months
seen Mar 30 at 15:40
Been programming for about 30 years. Started with BASIC, Pascal and assembler on 8 bit computers, later C, Modula-2, C++. Now mainly a Mac programmer, favoring REALbasic for its ease of use, where possible. Also doing iPhone development.

Mar
17
comment What does fast/normal/slow mean for Pentax auto-iso?
@rfusca, yes, I assume a static object, like taking landscape shots when nearly dark. I'd like having an option to allow longer exposure times when SR is on - Pentax has a lot of similar customization options, and that's what I love Pentax for.
Mar
17
revised What do Pentax, Sony, and Olympus DSLRs offer that differs from Canon and Nikon?
added 727 characters in body
Mar
17
revised What do Pentax, Sony, and Olympus DSLRs offer that differs from Canon and Nikon?
added 727 characters in body
Mar
17
answered What do Pentax, Sony, and Olympus DSLRs offer that differs from Canon and Nikon?
Mar
16
comment What does fast/normal/slow mean for Pentax auto-iso?
BTW, I've just documented a few related issues I've found with the K-3 on my crappy website: tempel.org/Photo/Photo#toc5
Mar
16
comment Pentax P-TTL: Why and when does underexposure occur and what can I do?
I have to say that your suggestion to use M mode for flash pictures was a totally new idea for me. I am surprised to see that the Camera is smart about limiting the exposure time to sync speed (1/180s) and then varies the amount of flash light as needed. Contrary to that, using other modes requires me to limit the auto ISO range because it tends to raise it too much too often. I think I will now set up one of my User modes for this purpose, in X mode.
Mar
16
comment What does fast/normal/slow mean for Pentax auto-iso?
And another thing: One would expect that activating Shake Reduction would have some effect on the minimum exposure time, but it doesn't. That's one thing that could need improvement. If only Pentax, uh, Ricoh, were more approachable...
Mar
16
comment What does fast/normal/slow mean for Pentax auto-iso?
A related question would be: How does this setting compare to the Program Line setting? I suppose that while we do have the "Program Line" setting to control how the P mode selects whether to keep the aperture open or closed as much as possible or keep the exposure time as short as possible, the ISO curve does a similar thing for the other modes (Av, Tv).
Mar
16
comment What does fast/normal/slow mean for Pentax auto-iso?
From my own testing, I get the impression that the rule is simply: "Slow" and "Fast" curves raises the ISO setting one LV step later or earlier compared to the "Normal" curve. Could be wrong, though, as I only tested with P mode so far. Feel free to prove my theory wrong :)
Mar
16
comment What does fast/normal/slow mean for Pentax auto-iso?
For your testing, keep 2 things in mind: 1. Set the Program line to Normal if you're P mode. 2. I do not believe the aperture affects the behavior directly. Instead, it decides on whether to raise ISO or instead lower exposure time or open the aperture when it has still room to work with the ISO value. So you need to adjust the lighting every time you switch a setting, then see at which point it rather changes ISO over the other parameters.
Mar
6
comment What's the difference between P mode vs. Av or Tv?
Yep, saw your question too late. But happy to see it still helps.
Mar
6
revised What's the difference between P mode vs. Av or Tv?
added 120 characters in body
Mar
6
answered What's the difference between P mode vs. Av or Tv?
Jan
9
answered What can I do about Pentax superzoom 18-270 autofocus problems?
Dec
20
accepted How do I ensure good color reproduction when photographing paintings with a mid-level DSLR?
Dec
20
comment How do I ensure good color reproduction when photographing paintings with a mid-level DSLR?
@jrista, thanks for all your info. Yes, I'm going into areas that are not practical for my current needs. But I also was looking for a definitive answer on my topic, and the first replies were textbook answers that were not even complete. I'll now accept your answer and officially finish this question by that. I could post a separate question about CRI, but I am not even sure what to ask, exactly. Since you have a better understanding, maybe you like to ask it yourself and answer it then? Sorry, I'm just feeling very unsure about this all right now.
Dec
20
comment How do I ensure good color reproduction when photographing paintings with a mid-level DSLR?
@RHall, that issue with matching the pigments correctly sounds reasonable. Isn't that also the "illuminant metameric failure" effect I mentioned earlier? Also, how do you suggest I make a color checker from existing paintings? I cannot pinpoint the colors in a painting exactly for measusing - it's simply not practical. And I cannot paint a new picture because the paint color are not available any more.
Dec
19
awarded  Yearling
Dec
19
comment How do I ensure good color reproduction when photographing paintings with a mid-level DSLR?
@AidenG, see my update about CRI. That's what I had in mind: That there are cases (though, unlikely when I use "good" light sources) where a simply white balance does NOT fix the colors. Also, the RAW converter would not know that it would have to correct certain spectral areas individually to correct such a bad light source. That's what I meant with not "trusting" it. I meant that I may need more control over what the RAW presets can do. Hence my suggestion of a color chart that would probably deal with such low-CRI errors. But it's theoretical, not really practical issue, I admit.
Dec
19
comment How do I ensure good color reproduction when photographing paintings with a mid-level DSLR?
@RHall, okay, but what about CRI, see my updated question. I am still not convinced that a simple white balance can fix all kinds of color inaccuracies, and what I just learned about CRI supports that. Of course, as you pointed out, a good light source would not cause this problem. I just like to get some confirmation on my findings.