|
May 3 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Mar 20 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Aug 8 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Jun 8 |
awarded | Caucus |
|
Feb 24 |
awarded | Nice Question |
|
Feb 20 |
awarded | Announcer |
|
Jan 10 |
awarded | Announcer |
|
Jan 10 |
awarded | Announcer |
|
Oct 12 |
awarded | Nice Question |
|
Jul 16 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Jun 29 |
awarded | Nice Answer |
|
May 6 |
comment |
How can I tell exactly what changed between two images? I'm just curious, with your method, how would you get an accurate representation of the difference between a 100% vs 70%, and 100% vs 40%? It seems you're just eyeballing until the difference is obvious. |
|
May 6 |
comment |
How can I tell exactly what changed between two images? @cabbey if you're asking for a pure bit-wise operation of the difference between the 2 images, then "Difference" blending mode alone gives you that. When you adjust threshold/curve, though the result is more obvious to the naked eye, but it's not an accurate representation of what has changed. When do you that, you're not longer comparing a 100% to a 95%. |
|
May 6 |
comment |
How can I tell exactly what changed between two images? @cabbey sure, comparing 100% to 95% you most likely will get a solid black. But that's what your question was asking isn't it? In your owner answer, you're changing the values from the originals being compared, which makes them no longer having the original compression settings. |
|
May 6 |
answered | How can I tell exactly what changed between two images? |
|
Mar 16 |
awarded | Nice Answer |
|
Jan 24 |
answered | Which photographer do you find inspirational? |
|
Jan 11 |
awarded | Convention |
|
Dec 11 |
awarded | Quorum |
|
Dec 9 |
awarded | Precognitive |