Open

by damned truths

submit your photo


Hall of Fame
View past winners from this year

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

691 reputation
520
bio website somethinkodd.com/oddthinking
location Sydney, Australia
age
visits member for 4 years, 5 months
seen Nov 26 at 0:06

I'm a software developer (currently focused on Python), living in Australia (currently focused on Sydney).

I am an on-again/off-again moderator of Skeptics.SE. (I was Pro Tem Moderator, I handed in my diamond when the first elections were held, and then ran in the second elections about a year later.)


Apr
15
comment Can the slant edge SFR method measure lens resolution greater than the Nyquist limit for the camera sensor?
@Sean, @whuber, please enter your suggestions as answers rather than comments, (see the big text box at the bottom of the page) so they can be voted upon and edited.
Apr
15
comment Why does a higher-end camera body like the Nikon D700 cost so much?
@Marcin, I worded my answer carefully to avoid suggesting that there is more R&D involved in the specialist cameras. Instead, I am arguing R&D costs per unit sold are higher.
Apr
13
answered Why does a higher-end camera body like the Nikon D700 cost so much?
Mar
2
comment What's the recommended off camera flash setup for Canon and Sunpak flash combination?
Are you sure that the 430EX II can be triggered by the 40D's pop-up flash? I thought it needed a line-of-sight infra-red signal from a 580EX or similar.
Feb
15
comment Why do images get “corrupted”?
Some computer cases have USB ports on the front and other ones on the back. Whichever side failed, try the other side. Sometimes devices can be strangely sensitive to this, for reasons I cannot explain.
Feb
1
comment Why is 1:1 desirable for a macro lens?
That makes a lot of sense, @Rowland, thank you. I guess the fact that it is just a line in the sand seems like an important part of the answer to the original question.
Feb
1
comment Why is 1:1 desirable for a macro lens?
Sure, but why is "true macro" so special? Imagine 1:0.9 or a 1:1.1 lenses. Both could "truly enlarge and enhance real world detail in print". 1:1 = True Macro seems to be an arbitrary metric, and not intrinsically any more desirable than nearby and/or even more powerful magnifications.
Jan
31
comment Why is 1:1 desirable for a macro lens?
This answer doesn't address the question. What is so special about 1:1? Is it a special milestone? If so, why? If not, do people treat it as one?
Jan
21
comment Etymology of “flash gun”
Wikipedia says: "Speedlite" is a Canon trade name. "Speedlight" is a Ricoh brand name. "The brand names are intended to indicate that strobe flashes produce much shorter and more intense bursts of light than earlier photographic lighting systems, such as flashbulbs, or continuous lamps used in some studio situations." en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speedlite
Jan
21
asked Etymology of “flash gun”
Jan
19
comment Why do my photos look better on an iMac?
@Reid, yes, we are agreeing. The Dell desktop can display nice images with the right display. It isn't a fundamental issue with Windows or Dell; it is an issue of which display has been purchased. I am using a nice Dell-branded LCD display which I paid a little more for.
Jan
19
accepted Should I be worried about ownership of photos taken on my camera by others?
Jan
19
comment Why do my photos look better on an iMac?
Yes, go visit @kacalapy's question. It has something these answers lack: hope and suggestions about how the problem can be fixed. Your desktop can display as well as the iMac, with the right screen.
Jan
18
awarded  Nice Question
Jan
17
comment Should I be worried about ownership of photos taken on my camera by others?
Great idea to take the book-end shots to make attribution much harder to dispute. How do you get the photos of you without those someones being involved?
Jan
17
comment Should I be worried about ownership of photos taken on my camera by others?
If you knew the photo was taken by the friend, I have to agree that his permission for the publication needs to be sought. Which doesn't mean you don't get a cut. After all, without your co-operation, he doesn't have any photo at all. One the tricky area is what if you think you took the picture? The other tricky area, it seems to me, is what permissions were implicitly given to you when the transaction was made.
Jan
17
comment Should I be worried about ownership of photos taken on my camera by others?
Is that risk high enough to justify to yourself the refusal to lend your camera? (I appreciate this is a subjective question.)
Jan
17
comment Should I be worried about ownership of photos taken on my camera by others?
I added an update to handle the situation where there is an agreement in place. Your girlfriend's situation is quite different to what I was thinking. As to people's personal responsibility for breakages, that comes under the "many other issues" that explicitly ignored.
Jan
17
revised Should I be worried about ownership of photos taken on my camera by others?
added 121 characters in body
Jan
17
comment Should I be worried about ownership of photos taken on my camera by others?
Agree that photographs of the photographer are unlikely to be disputed. It is the photo after that one, which is the concern.