Sunset in Kruger

by MrFrench

submit your photo


Hall of Fame
View past winners from this year

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Tag Info

New answers tagged

7

The originals were that. The originals. Obviously you tried to keep the negatives in a safe manner because the nitrates and films were very flammable, could being eaten by fungus, decolor, or all kind of things. Even in remastering on movies like Star Wars they went for the original negatives, which were in bad shape. In feature films after the original ...


0

Not to sound schoolmasterish, but, if you don't want this frustration to be repeated, then you need to be diligent about digital asset management. Keep originals, and keep edited photos worth keeping. If you use some kind of image management application for cataloguing digital images, pay attention to where it is saving files, and if it is saving copies when ...


6

If the images actually are duplicates then the additional data is most likely to be metadata which has been added at some point. In other words the files have been modified, although the picture itself has not been touched. Most likely an automated function in your photo viewing/management software has done it. For example facial recognition which is ...



Top 50 recent answers are included