Open

by damned truths

submit your photo


Hall of Fame
View past winners from this year

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Take the 2-minute tour ×
Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Can anyone please recommend free (preferably also portable i.e. no need to install) software for Windows XP or later to improve image quality of large (12 megapixel) terrestrial (not astronomical) photos, by deconvolution to reduce motion blur (preferably automatically)?

I've tried Unshake 1.5 by M.D. Cahill but the result seems worse than the original (looks oversharpened) and it crashes on 12 megapixel images.

share|improve this question
3  
The term point spread function might help finding such software. –  romkyns Mar 9 '11 at 22:56
1  
Does it perhaps crash because you don't have enough RAM? (Just an idea.) –  Simon A. Eugster Mar 10 '11 at 14:10
    
Indeed, I get this error 'Exception in thread "AWT-EventQueue-0" java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space' even with 2GB free according to Windows Task Manager. –  Gnubie Mar 11 '11 at 20:21
    
To fix the crash of the Unshake Java software, you could try to expand the Java Heap space, the 128Mo default value seems to be too small. This can be done in the Java Control Panel or on the command line launcher of the application, if it has one. –  Laurent Jégou Mar 13 '11 at 9:51
1  
Java will only allocate well below 2GB unless you pass the extra -Xmx command line flag. –  You Mar 21 '11 at 9:41

5 Answers 5

up vote 8 down vote accepted

In case this is useful to anyone else, I found that Image Analyzer 1.33 from MeeSoft is a freeware claiming to do "Deconvolution for out-of-focus and motion blur compensation".

share|improve this answer

SmartDeblur 2.0 is a free program providing 4 distinct methods for restoring defocused / blurry pictures:

Automatic parameters settings:

  • Blind Deconvolution Deblur

Manual parameters settings:

  • Out-of-Focus Blur
  • Motion Blur
  • Gaussian Blur

A bit slow in the Automatic Deconvolution processing phase (1-3 minutes, depending on original); subsequent optional smoothing phases are much faster; can produce some amazing results indeed

Cannot get much better for the price; well worth a try; get it here:

http://smartdeblur.net/index.html

SmartDeblur's author, Vladimir Yuzhikov, also conveniently elaborates on

  • The Theory of restoration of defocused and blurred images
  • The Practical aspects of operations

Cheers,

__philippe

share|improve this answer
    
Version 2.0 for windows is a free download; the previous 1.27 version (which lacks automatic detection) is open source under the GPLv3 (written in C++ with QT). –  mattdm Apr 15 '13 at 13:50
    
Free version adds watermarks all over. –  Noumenon Aug 31 at 20:21

have a look at ImageJ, which is an open source project, written in Java, which will run on 32 and 64-bit Windows, OS X and Linux platforms

share|improve this answer
    
Specifically rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/plugins/deconvolutionj.html, or there others? That plugin looks to require a rather large amount of user expertise. –  mattdm Dec 6 '11 at 11:33
1  
yes, that's the one... agree that it's a tall order, but then, deconvolution is not for the faint of heart :-O –  Florenz Kley Dec 15 '11 at 22:47

Give Blurity a shot. It has a free demo mode, though you'll have to pay for it if you want an un-watermarked image. It's quality software, and quality software has a price.

share|improve this answer
    
Some quality software has a price. A lot of really poor software is expensive, whereas there is both high and low quality free software .Android, Eclipse, Paint.net, Ubuntu and Angry birds are all free, and quality software. Some of them even provide you with the source code so you can learn and improve it yourself. –  Poldie Apr 15 '13 at 14:18

You could try Topaz InFocus or Topaz Detail both are extremly good programs.

InFocus - rescues blurred images using deconvolution

Detail - sharpening, tonal contrast

share|improve this answer
5  
Could you provide a little more explanation? Why do you like these, and what are the differences? –  chills42 Mar 10 '11 at 15:36
    
Thanks, but according to topazlabs.com/infocus and topazlabs.com/detail, they cost about $70 and $40 respectively. Any free ones? –  Gnubie Mar 11 '11 at 20:13

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.