Road Train !!!!!!!!!!

by Russell McMahon

submit your photo


Hall of Fame
View past winners from this year

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Take the 2-minute tour ×
Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am using snow leopard and mainly want it to automate the stacking as much as possible. I have seen that PixInSight looks pretty awesome, but that's not free, in-fact far from it, so I want something that is free that can do the same, or as much as possible.

share|improve this question
2  
I wonder if you'd have better luck with your question if terms like "Astrophotography" or "Star Trails" (if that's what you're up to) appeared in your question's title. "Stacking" is used for several different techniques. In fact, I had assumed you would be asking about focus stacking. –  Lyman Enders Knowles Feb 13 '11 at 0:17
    
Yes stacking for astro photography is what I was wanting it for. I will try to make things clearer with my next post –  Designer023 Feb 14 '11 at 13:45
    
I posted a script for GIMP at photo.stackexchange.com/questions/8092/… that might help you. Also, the asker of that question has recently asked some other astrophotography-related questions, so you might check out some of his other questions. –  drewbenn Feb 15 '11 at 17:50

3 Answers 3

up vote 7 down vote accepted

Hugin might be your answer. At least it is available for the Mac and handles stacking of images (also into EXR-format), masking and distortion-correction of images. It is not per se meant for astrophotography, so you would have to know what to do.

As for automation (of the aligning) - I put each of my Stacks/Stitches into separate directories and just let a script run over all these directories, applying "autopano" or "align_image_stack" on all files in the directory. You have to check and correct the ready .pto-file afterwards.

share|improve this answer
    
That is exactly what I was after. Thank you and thanks for the tips on usage. That should get me off to a great start –  Designer023 Feb 13 '11 at 12:16

I've been using StarStaX to stack photos to make star trails. It's features are relatively limited in that it really is specifically for stacking images to create star trails only, but it's easy to use and works well.

share|improve this answer

CombineZP should run fine on an Intel Mac (after you get rid of OS/X and install Windows).

Edit: Since a lot of people seem to have missed the point and think this isn't helpful, let me try to put things more directly. I am reasonably certain there is not currently any free (in either sense) software for stacking that runs directly on MacOS and is anywhere close to as good as CombineZP.

I'm relatively OS-agnostic -- I have two Macs (a 24" iMac and a now rather elderly Macbook). For me, choosing between Windows and MacOS is mostly a matter of picking what works better. For stacking, I use CombineZP on a PC. I have not been able to find anything that runs directly on MacOS that produces nearly as good of results, or is nearly as easy to use (for this task). Hugin works quite nicely for stitching panoramas, but stacking isn't really its forte. It can sort of work, but it's semi-painful to use for the job (all the docs and UI are oriented toward stitching panoramas) and even with quite a bit of manual labor, the results from it are still inferior to what CombineZP produces entirely automatically.

Bottom line: A copy of Windows + CombineZP costs less and works better than anything you can get natively for MacOS. Sorry, but that's just how it is.

share|improve this answer
    
Or you could just run it in Crossover (probably would work). –  Kendall Helmstetter Gelner Feb 13 '11 at 1:04
    
When you put it like that it seems to make much more sense. Not having a PC and not wanting to setup a dual boot on my macbook, can I use a virtualPC with not too much trouble, or is it too processer intensive? –  Designer023 Feb 15 '11 at 15:58
1  
@Designer023: I've never tried to run it under a VM, so I can't say much about how well it'll work that way. It's pretty processor intensive, so I would expect it to be on the slow side. At the same time, it's sufficiently automated that in most cases you can load the images you want to stack, click on "all methods" and just go do something else for a few minutes while it does its thing. –  Jerry Coffin Feb 15 '11 at 16:12
    
I will try and dig out my old copy of XP and give it a go. I would imagine that it won;t be too much of a strain on VM –  Designer023 Feb 15 '11 at 16:33

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.