Serene Life

by garik

submit your photo


Hall of Fame
View past winners from this year

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Take the 2-minute tour ×
Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm looking at getting into IR photography, and am trying to decide what cutoff frequency filter to buy. Has anyone done a comparison of the same scenes using different filters?

share|improve this question

3 Answers 3

up vote 9 down vote accepted

Well, I haven't personally, but the folks over at Life Pixel have. In summary:

  • 830nm - Deep blacks. Very contrasty in B&W.

  • Hoya R72/Wratten 89b /720nm - The most 'common' choice. Good all-around tone range, but less saturated than a 665nm filter.

  • 665nm - More saturation and color range. B&W will be less contrasty than the 720nm.

  • 590nm - Vibrant, intense colors. less over-all contrast. More possibilities for interesting surreal color shifting in post.

Pictures of all of the above options can be viewed at the Life Pixel website. Full disclosure: I am a customer of Life Pixel, having gotten my Canon 20D converted by them a couple years ago (went with the 720nm, Hoya R72 equivalent and I completely love it!). I don't get anything for mentioning them... Just a happy customer. :-)

share|improve this answer
    
LDP ( maxmax.com ) does high-quality conversions as well. And B&W done from a 590nm image make absolutely beautiful portraits of (Caucasian) women -- the skin tones acquire that porcelain perfection that Tech Pan and unfiltered B&W IR films were known for. –  user2719 Feb 4 '11 at 3:52

I would go for the 720 nm, any longer (800s and you're limited to pure black and white - i.e. you get no colour response. Any shorter (500-600) and you start to lose some of the IR look, that is to say the very dark skies and glowing vegetation.

A 720nm filter is a good choice for a first IR camera as you can get the look of any of the other filters (with a bit of extra post production) so you can decide which look you like best:

Here's a deep IR conversion, in monochrome.

Here I've gone for a super vibrant colours look (for demonstration purposes ;)

Finally here's the look I prefer, leaving a subtle hint of colour.

These were all shot with a Canon 450D with 720nm conversion done by Protech in the UK. I was 100% satisfied with the service but it's worth pointing out that another company, ACS (advanced camera services) also do conversions though their prices are a little higher.

share|improve this answer

I use a Sigma DSLR for IR work, as you can remove the internal IR filter to allow IR wavelengths to pass and then use a filter atop your lens and then put it back when you want to switch back to color photography. A suggestion I would make is to look first at using gels - they are very cheap flexible sheets that cut IR (I have a Wratten 89b gel), and you can use them in Cokin-P square filter holders which in turn are also very cheap (the gels may require some cutting down to fit in a holder).

You can also try shooting without any filters at all, it can be especially interesting around dusk to gain more light - here's an example which I believe used the camera with no IR filter whatsoever (no internal and no external filter):

enter image description here

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.