by ʇolɐǝz ǝɥʇ qoq

Submit your Photo
Hall of Fame

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I was wondering if anyone has had experience with using the Alien Skin Bokeh application. Is it worthwhile, or it gimmicky? Thanks!

share|improve this question
why not download the trial and play for yourself? Also, OnOne software does Focal Point - which is similiar – Wayne Feb 2 '11 at 21:48

I've played around with it, but elected not to buy it. I was fairly impressed with the results, when it worked, but found it only worked in a tiny subset of cases.

here is pretty much a best case example:

Bokeh Comparison

the subject is pretty clearly defined from the background (decent shallow depth of field to begin with) and doesn't have long hair.

I could not create a single example that I'd consider worth posting for any person with long hair, which was dissappointing. If you're willing to spend a great amount of time in photoshop tweaking the selection, perhaps you may do better.

share|improve this answer
how is this different from selecting the background with lasso/magnetic lasso and Gaussian Blurring it? (just curious) – JoséNunoFerreira Feb 2 '11 at 23:19
it does a better job of aping the look of a real lens. The tool actually has a number of presets for specific lenses (known for their good bokeh), and then lets you tweak. You can simulare a variety of effects like number of aperture blades, etc. as well. – Jon.Griffen Feb 2 '11 at 23:45
@JoséNunoFerreira Don't ever use Gaussian Blur to replicate a lens blur. Photoshop has a Lens Blur filter that's much more suited. – Kenneth Ballenegger Feb 3 '11 at 0:40

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.