Time to be with your loved ones

Time to be with loved ones

by sat

submit your photo


Hall of Fame
View past winners from this year

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Take the 2-minute tour ×
Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Currently debating which of these lens to get. The f/4 does have the advantage of being lighter, and there have been reviews that it's sharper than the f/2.8 wide open or with both at f/4.

Rather than try to tell me which is better for MY needs, I'd like to hear about your own experience with these lenses, what your requirements are of them, and how you feel they met your requirements.

Any comments about or experience with the 70-200/2.8 IS II is also more than welcome.

share|improve this question
    
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 4 down vote accepted

Although I cannot comment on the f/4 lens, I am absolutely in love with the EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS. Since buying it last year, it became my preferred portrait lens, delivering beautiful bokeh and great sharpness (esp. when my reference is the 28-135mm kit lens). It certainly met my expectations. That said, I knew that it doesn't set a world record in sharpness, so I am prepared for some (very little, don't get me wrong) compromise.

It is considerably more bulky than the f/4 and I recommend you go to the photo store near you to see them both side by side.

share|improve this answer
    
I find the 70-200 to be incredibly sharp, probably canon's sharpest zoom lens (I generally prefer primes). Its especially sharp backed off from either end slightly, like from 80-190mm –  Shizam Feb 2 '11 at 17:58
    
@Shizam - which of the 5 70-200? As the OP noted, the f/4 is considered as sharper than the f/2.8. –  ysap Feb 2 '11 at 18:25
    
@ysap Oh, right, I'm referencing the 70-200 f2.8 IS. Though it should be noted in brick-wall/newspaper testing the 70-200 f2.8 non-IS is sharper than the IS version :) –  Shizam Feb 2 '11 at 19:16
    
@Shizam - I actually assumed that both have the same optics and sharpness. It is not counterintuitive, though, that the non-IS is sharper. –  ysap Feb 2 '11 at 20:52
    
Thanks all for the input. It seems there aren't many f/4 owners. I'll go to a store to check them both out myself. –  zweiasakura Feb 3 '11 at 22:01
show 2 more comments

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.