Serene Life

by garik

submit your photo


Hall of Fame
View past winners from this year

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Take the 2-minute tour ×
Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

While there was a good discussion of using a lab vs. a personal printer, I'm curious what folks see as the advantages to using a pro photo lab as compared to the local drugstore or supermarket. Why should a photographer send files to someone like Miller's or White House Custom Color instead of just having images printed at the local WalMart or Walgreen's?

share|improve this question

5 Answers 5

up vote 25 down vote accepted

From a photography business owner's perspective, the reasons I use a pro lab are:

  1. Paper selection - My lab offers me literally a dozen options for paper.
  2. Size Matters - Try getting a supermarket to print you a 30x60. ;-) Seriously, though... I rarely print anything smaller than an 8x10, and most of the time bigger than that... Supermarkets are designed to spit out 5x7s or 4x6s by the hundreds, but anything bigger than that quickly gets expensive and slow... Or the answer becomes 'we can't do that.'
  3. Eyes on the Print - At my lab a human reviews the images before they're printed on state-of-the-art color calibrated gear, and they're trained, competent and I trust them to make adjustments on the fly if need-be. Additionally I can tell them to print 'as-is' (e.g. don't touch or adjust anything!) on a print-by-print basis. At the supermarket whether I like it or not a computer algorithm is going to decide if my prints are too dark or too light and then monkey with the exposure in a formulaic way blowing out all my highlights, or muddying my shadows, without caring a bit for the artistry or intent of the pictures. And if anyone is looking at them, it's generally going to be a pimply-faced minimum-wager with no training to speak of.
  4. What else can you print on? - Canvas wraps, albums, giclee prints. Try getting those printed at the supermarket.
  5. When Quality Counts - Better quality ink. Better quality paper. Better quality in general.
  6. Brand that Sucker! - At my lab I get a clearly printed copyright statement on the back of every print, and a gold-foil logo on the bottom right corner on the front.

Now I do realize that some of the above only apply to business owners, but in general even my students can see the benefit of #1, #2, #3, and #5 even for their personal projects and work that they just want to hang in their own homes...

share|improve this answer
8  
One other thing that is incredibly important: consistency. Printing out a photo of a bride or landscape Jan 24th 10am should look the same as one printed out June 15th at 4pm. Not even all pro labs can get this right between changes in hardware/software/people/humidity/etc. –  Shizam Feb 1 '11 at 18:48
    
Excellent point! –  Jay Lance Photography Feb 1 '11 at 18:57
    
On #5 you missed better quality chemistry (or more accurately, better chemistry management) since anything decent is not going to be printed by inkjets, but rather on real photo paper that has to be developed. –  cabbey Feb 2 '11 at 20:17
1  
And a pro lab won't decide arbitrarily that your photos are "too good" and therefore you can't possibly own the copyright, so they refuse to print them. –  Мסž Feb 2 '11 at 22:34
1  
@gone - funny, this actually happened to me when I once printed this photo photo.stackexchange.com/questions/7784/… at Walgreens. They wouldn't give me the print before I signed a declaration of original ownership... –  ysap Mar 27 '11 at 20:36

There are a few key differences typically.

  1. The quality of the ink is higher, usually standing the test of time better.
  2. The color gamut is usually higher, resulting in richer colors.
  3. The paper quality is typically higher, resulting in both of the above.

Even among the pro printers, there can be differences. See the Smugmug Photo Lab comparison, for instance.

share|improve this answer

The big trade-off is quality for convenience.

Grocery and department stores (like Walmart and Target) are pretty common, so they are fairly convenient to get to. Most of those types of stores are limited to prints that are 8x10 or smaller. Their decent enough for family pictures and sharing physical pictures with your friends. However, I find the quality to suffer. The colors are flat, you're forced to buy glossy paper, the kid behind the counter doesn't always know what they're doing. In some cases I've seen the focus on the picture get a little soft, and in other cases it was artificially over-sharpened.

Pro shops have a vested interest in keeping their professional customers happy. They are going to make sure the machines are properly calibrated and color balanced. If you are printing from slides (as I do often enough), they will ensure the colors match the slide as best they can. You can choose several different paper finishes from matte to glossy and a few in between.

If I'm printing a bunch of vacation photos for my wife to use in her scrap booking, I'll go for convenience and cheap. At 4x6, or in a pinch 5x7, the grocery/department store prints are quite acceptable.

if I'm doing any critical work, or submitting something for a competition, I will go for quality and getting it done right. My local pro shop will spend some time with me to understand what it is that I really need when I have special orders. When I did a poster size enlargement, it was just right.

share|improve this answer

The main difference is that the mass-market option is going to assume that the source is lousy. Every image gets the equivalent of the "one click photo fixer" option in mass-marketed image editors -- your contrast, sharpness, white balance, and so forth are going to be "fixed" for you. It doesn't do much if your image meets the limits of the histogram profiles they match against, but if you do high-key or low-key images, they'll "fix" them for you in most cases.

Of course, there are some outlets that have conscientious people working there who will override the auto settings on the equipment, but you'd probably have to shop around to find the Robin Williams guy/gal at one of your local minilabs -- and then there's no guarantee that that person will be doing the work next time around.

Of course, there are other benefits to professional finishing, as Jay Lance Photography detailed, that can mean a lot to somebody who wants to display or market their work, but even if all you want is a physical copy of your image for your own viewing, it's worth the trouble to get something that accurately reflects your work.

share|improve this answer

A while back I sent out the same image to about 10 labs, ranging from consumer to professional, with walk in and mail order labs at either end of the scale. Unsurprisingly, the pro lab images were much higher quality, but usually took longer to arrive (the cheapest lab had amazing service, but a rubbish image).

Taking everything into account, including uploading images etc I ended up going for a pro lab in the next town, mainly for the reasons mentioned in by Jay Lance Photography.

So my advice is to try a few options and see what works best for you!

share|improve this answer
    
Did you publish this information anywhere online (such as a blog) where one could read more about the performance/results from the various vendors? –  ahockley Feb 2 '11 at 14:10
    
@ahockley Dunno if they did, but SmugMug did: smugmug.com/photos/pro-print-labs-compared (and the older, needs to be retired, one: smugmug.com/prints/digital-prints.mg) (Disclaimer, I work for SmugMug.) –  cabbey Feb 2 '11 at 20:14
    
I didn't get round to publishing the results, but they went something like Photobox - Great service but dark print, DSCL/Loxley - I didn't get on with their ordering systems, DigitalPFP - slow & expensive but great prints in the end it was OneVision imaging in Coventry that won out, good prints and service and local to me which always helps. –  LC1983 Feb 3 '11 at 13:12

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.