Paris

by Jon

submit your photo


Hall of Fame
View past winners from this year

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Take the 2-minute tour ×
Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I own a D90 with a Nikon 50mm f/1.8 prime lens. However ever since buying my camera I am struggling to find a proper workflow to process RAW images on my Mac which does at least the following

  1. Adjust shadows and highlights.
  2. Adjust an image via its histogram.
  3. Adjust white balance.
  4. Adjust exposure.
  5. Crop a photo.
  6. Present a preview of how the photo may look like after printing.
  7. Apply EXIF tags.
  8. Apply watermarks.

So my question is what kind of workflow should I follow, if I were constrained to use only free software on my Mac?

Edit: Please also suggest a software or a set of software applications to use.

Edit: Flagged as a wiki question since there can't be correct or perfect answer.

Edit: Given the fact that a freeware will probably not be able to cut it, I have come to the conclusion that I will need to buy a low cost software for this. I am keen on using Lightroom but may have to settle with iPhoto.

share|improve this question
2  
Can you clarify whether your desire for FOSS is driven by price sensitivity (you want free as in beer) or philosophy/ethics (you want free as in liberty)? –  Reid Jul 17 '10 at 15:42
3  
Price sensitivity is the main reason for asking this question. I would rather money to buy another lens than a software. –  Swapnonil Mukherjee Jul 17 '10 at 19:05
    
Are you currently at school or university? Education discounts can make photography software much more affordable. I'd recommend Aperture for your needs which I got for £60 instead of £120. Frankly, your processing software is going to get more use than a lens. You'll be using it for every photo. –  MJeffryes Dec 3 '10 at 21:36
1  
Note that much of the software for Linux will also build on OS X, with differing degrees of porting work required. So see this question on Linux raw software: photo.stackexchange.com/questions/471 –  mattdm Mar 22 '11 at 4:14
1  
Don't overlook Apple's own iPhoto. Its got some decent editing capability built in, and comes on Macs, and is well integrated into apps on the Mac. If you want the latest version its a cheap upgrade via the Mac Store. I use Aperture right now, but used to use Lightroom and Photoshop regularly. And, I've used Gimp, so its a possible candidate too. –  Greg Mar 22 '11 at 6:13

5 Answers 5

up vote 12 down vote accepted

Given that the reason for the question is price, I encourage you to rethink this constraint. How much is your time worth? You can get excellent post-processing software for little money compared to a lens. For example, Bibble can do everything above in the same application (might need a plugin for the watermark) and it costs only $100 for the lite version.

I tried to go the same route (on Linux) and got tired of screwing around with freeware. The commercial software is way better and your time is worth more than you think it is - particularly since the smoother post-processing is, the more fun photography will be. :)

share|improve this answer
1  
Couldn't have put it better myself. ;) –  jrista Jul 29 '10 at 23:43
    
What (commercial) software do you use on Linux? –  Adam Byrtek Sep 16 '10 at 22:42
1  
Bibble. It's OK but better than freeware alternatives. –  Reid Sep 19 '10 at 1:54

I know you asked for free stuff, however given that I whole-heartedly agree with Reid about how valuable your time is.

Have you looked into Adobe Photoshop Elements 8? This is a powerful little tool that offers everything your looking for, in a single package, for a very cheap price (relatively speaking.) For $80, you can have a nice, professional tool that serves your needs, without any hassle.

I am not sure how much $80 (or quite possibly less, deals for PSE8 are all over the net, and you can often get it bundled with camera equipment even) affects your bottom line, but it seems rather trivial compared to say $1000 for a new lens. At least with Elements, you could get the most out of the lenses you do buy. ;)

share|improve this answer
    
I'd second that suggestion. I use Elements and I've yet to get into a situation where I wished I had Photoshop or Aperture. Great piece of software, and good value. –  Chris Betterton Dec 4 '10 at 12:09
    
Myself I'm using Photoshop CS5 because I need it for other things as well. I didn't know that Elements version is so cheap. +1 –  Robert Koritnik Apr 30 '11 at 17:17

I shoot Canon, so my workflow will be slightly different... but I use:

  • Picasa to upload/organize

  • Digital Photo Professional (Canon only) for most cropping/simple adjustment.

  • Gimp for almost all the other processing.

share|improve this answer
1  
+1, except for Picasa. I rarely upload, and when I do it is to Flickr. I organize on chronological basis on my hdd (automatically with EOS Utility). –  ysap Mar 22 '11 at 18:38

You should take a look at RawTherapee. It used to be a proprietary application, but the author changed that a few years ago and now it is available under the GPL. You have to compile it yourself to run it on Mac OS X, but I guess that is part of the FOSS experience.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks for mentioning RawTherapee, i didn't know it and it's looking promising. –  Laurent Jégou Apr 30 '11 at 7:44

Pisca provides basic photo editing tools (crop and colour and level adjustments) as well as good EXIF tagging. Have a look at GimpShop application which is based on the GIMP but with a more Apple/Photoshop style user interface.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.