by ʇolɐǝz ǝɥʇ qoq

Submit your Photo
Hall of Fame

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I started recently supplying Location metadata to my images (not geolocation, I do that in a few cases but hardly for all of them) and I thought »Hey, a smart collection that contains all images without location would be handy«. I then created one with

Location | is |

(the text box at the end is empty – not even whitespace) for lack of something like »is empty«. But now the collection shows no images at all, although I know there are still images with no location information there.

Is there a trick I just don't know or is it impossible to create such a smart collection? I noticed that the built-in smart collection that filters photos without keywords uses an »is empty« filter which exists for keywords but not for Location.

share|improve this question
I just tried an empty field in Lightroom 3, and it seems to be working as you & I would expect: all photos without a setting on that field are being included. Is there a chance some other setting on your collection is tripping it up? – Craig Walker Jan 15 '11 at 20:12
@Craig: Lightroom 2 here. Sorry. – Joey Jan 15 '11 at 21:33

As we've discussed in the question comments, it's working for me as expected in Lightroom 3.

So, I guess one "answer" is "Upgrade". :-\ It's $99.

share|improve this answer
Which is what I spent on LR2 already too (student version). I think I just do the workaround by selecting all photos and then refine using the filter bar. – Joey Jan 15 '11 at 21:49

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.