by ʇolɐǝz ǝɥʇ qoq

Submit your Photo
Hall of Fame

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I've heard much of Ansel Adams' Zone system, but I've never quite understood it. What is it, how and where is it used, and is it still useful with modern (digital) cameras? Thanks!

share|improve this question
I'm sure we'll get some good answers to this, but I do want to add that the Wikipedia article on the topic gives a pretty decent overview. – mattdm Jan 11 '11 at 5:04
Another reference: my favorite author on photography, Michael Freeman, covers the Zone System specifically in its application to modern digital photography in his book Perfect Exposure. (This one:…, not to be confused with the dozens of other books with the same name.) – mattdm Jan 11 '11 at 5:07
I love Michael Freeman's books! – jrista Jan 11 '11 at 5:12
I'd highly recommend Ansel's own book on the subject: The Negative. Read it along with its companions The Camera and The Print. All are still in print, and they were written to teach his techniques. – RBerteig Jan 11 '11 at 9:25
This article made me 'get' the zone system - at least the basics of it. Good text and good examples. – Hamish Downer Jan 12 '11 at 21:10
up vote 56 down vote accepted

The basic rule: All photometers are metering the exposure base on middle gray.

Let's say that you have a scene with only middle gray luminosity colour; if you base your exposure on the meter reading for an area of this scene, the picture will be exposed so it's as you saw it.

Now let's say that you have a woman wearing a black dress and a black background. If you calculate the exposure based on the meter reading for this scene the resulting photograph will be a grey dress and a grey background, because the metering is giving you the exposure as if you metered on an area of grey!. To correct this exposure you need to add -2 stops.

The same thing for happens with white. Let's say that you have a woman with a white dress, on a white background. The metered exposure will give you a grey dress on a grey background, because again the metering is giving you the exposure for a grey subject!.Add +2 stops to get the correct exposure in this case.

Now what is the trick. The zone system says that it is up to you to determine how you would like to photograph your scene, and it's up to you to determine where you'd like to put emphasis in your photo.

Its up to you to decide what is black, what is white and what is grey, and to make the final exposure.

What does that mean? Let's say that you have any normal scene. In that scene you have highlights, you have shadows, and you have other areas of middle tone.

Let's say now that you have 2 women, both wearing black dresses, in front of a white background. One of the women is under a spot light, the other is in shadow. It's up to you to decide which woman will have the black dress in the final exposure, as you can't have both exposed to be black due to the differing lighting conditions. The full luminosity range of the picture is the zone system.

If you make a measure on the woman in the shadow's black dress and correct the exposure with -2 stops, then the woman on the spot light black dress will probably get washed out.

If you measure the woman in the spot-light's black dress and correct the exposure with -2 stops then the woman in the shadow will be totally dark.

If you try to make them both appears then you get the average reading between the 2 blacks, and correct with -2stops, then no one will be totally correct.

To summarise:

  • If you shoot any scene have a range of luminosity, and break this range into parts, then you have the zone system. Then it's up to you to decide what is black, what is white, what is gray, and make your final photo.

Olympus OM System

I will have as reference the Olympus OM system that have still now the best and only multi-spot metering system, and I wish some one add the same multi spot metering system on all new digital cameras.

From the olympus om 4ti manual I get the example photos.


A white example photograph.

you have a white area, if you just metering as it is you get a gray results, but you decide that you like to make it white. You make a spot metering on white and add +2 stops and the results


A black example photograph.

You have a black telephone, if you just take the picture you get a gray telephone. You decide that you wish to see it black, you take a spot metering on the black spot on the telephone and you add -2stops, and the results is a real black phone

Full range luminocity

and a full zone system.

Here you have too many different point of luminosity. If you decide that wish to get a picture that the womans dress must be white, then you make a spot metering on white and add +2spot. On multi spot metering of olympus is more easy, you take 2 spots on white and on skin color, and you have a good average with a not so bright white dress and a good luminosity of the face. and the results

Now to try to show the zone system, I make the picture pixelize and you can see the different luminosity rectangles. The zone system say that every scene have this range and its up to you to decide what luminosity you going to select on you shot. So you select a rectangle spot, you decide what luminosity this have (gray ? white ? black ? etc) you make the measure, correct the exposure and take the picture.

note on this example the womans dress, gets out middle gray, on the previous was an average metering, not a white dress metering, do not confuse the last two photos with the white dress that I am writing on comments.

and is it still useful with modern (digital) cameras?

Yes of course it is. The metering are the same, the scenes are the same, the technique is the same. I say it again, if the modern cameras have multi spot metering then we going to have a real tool for correct exposure.

Not only digital cameras use the same technique but adobe photoshop also use the same technique. Almost on all correction on the images you have see the 3 eyedroped tools. If you do not know why they are there, I tell you is there to help you correct the zone system of your photos. See this example and make later your test to find out how to use them:

share|improve this answer
+1 one for an exemplary answer, with useful figures. – RBerteig Jan 11 '11 at 9:19
That's quite an answer! I was going to have a stab, but I think I would be superfluous :) +1 – AJ Finch Jan 11 '11 at 10:51
+1 -- the first time I've understood the Zone System, thanks! – nthonygreen Apr 2 '11 at 10:42
I have used this system it seems, without even knowing it was a system! Whilst taking landscape photos in the snow, the bright white snow was being consistently underexposed because the camera was trying to meter it as a mid grey. I had to do +2 stops to bring it back to a brilliant white! :) – Mike Jan 17 '12 at 15:27
@Mike Yes, if you know this tric, you get very good white or black colors and your photos make the different compare them with the others that do not know what this is. – Aristos Jan 17 '12 at 15:31

Aristos' answer is incomplete, as the true power of the Zone system lays not only in effective spot metering (what Aristos described), but in the compression and expansion of the tonal range in development. I can't reply to posts, so I'll piggyback on his.

This is what a zone scale looks like (ignore the gray scale values): Zone system scale

By default, most B&W film will render the scene before us more or less as it exists. If there's a 1 stop difference in light between a highlight and shadow, that's what we'll see. But what if we'd like to boost that difference? Make the lighting more dramatic? We can do it in post processing, or we can do it right on the negative using the Zone system.

Black and white film can be overdeveloped for an effect knowing as pushing. It's a darkroom technique often used by photographers to compensate for underexposing film, and you'll often hear photographers say, "I shot my ISO 400 film at ISO 800 and pushed it." That means they underexposed their roll by a stop and overdeveloped in an attempt to get a usable image. In practice, this develops the upper zones and leaves the lower zones alone, the science behind that is waaay out of the scope of this post. In effect, it changes the even tonal scale and increases effective contrast.

That might sound kind of complicated, so I'll give you an example:

Imagine you have a tree stump that we want to be a nice, brilliant white while the leaves on the ground should be dark, something to create a mood. We meter our leaves (per Aristos' example) and get a reading of 1/60 f/8. Since we want them to be dark - Zone III - we reduce our exposure by two stops and get 1/125 f/11 (one stop from each). That's going to be our exposure.

We want a bright, brilliant tree stump (it's a birch) so we meter it as well. Since we have a reading for our Zone III (1/125 f/11), what we're looking for is how many zones away our tree stump is. It meters to 1/125 f/11 - 'ah, so it's the same as the leaves' you think - but not quite. Our meter reads everything as Zone V, so it's actually 2 zones away. That's not much of a distance, and we want it to be all the way in our bright, brilliant zone - Zone VII. So we make a note that this image needs a bump from Zone V to Zone VII.

Open the shutter, expose, we have the image on film and it's off to the darkroom for the final step.

Now, the film needs to be overdeveloped long enough to push Zone V into Zone VII. Again, this is because film development is an uneven process: shadows get developed first, and once they're developed they stay in their place. The higher up you go on that zone chart, the more time you need to develop, and the more "movable" the zones are. In effect, you're just scrunching up the higher zones like so:

Not really 1000% accurate, but close enough


In reality, the Zone system is a lot of work. Every film with every developer gives a slightly different result/effective speed. You need to calibrate your exposure, check neg densities, do everything exactly the same time, and time and time again. It's also a system that thrives on large format, since you shoot every image on a different neg and develop each of those individually. The large negative also helps with the increased graininess that comes from pushing film. Most photographers I know who use the zone system shoot two negs: they develop one according to their charts, then they develop the second neg based on their results with the first one.

Does this part of the Zone system transfer to digital? Sort of, but not really. Digital does much better in highlights than in shadows, and it's better to overexpose a scene then push it down in PP. Knowing how your camera records exposure is great, but remembering stuff like this is one of those times when I am really happy with the digital revolution.

share|improve this answer
Great addendum Jedrek. – Shizam Feb 8 '11 at 16:44
I think that your answer is better. Take it from an eyewitness. – Stan Sep 4 '13 at 5:05
To be fair, my description of the zone system is actually of the zone system. The top answer describes zone metering which, while great, is not what was actually asked for. – Jędrek Kostecki Nov 21 '13 at 7:51

It's important to realise two things. Firstly, Adams was exposing single sheets of film in his view camera - not rolls - so he could vary the development time per-negative, and secondly he pretty much always printed on the same paper, with the same gamma and tonal range. So his zone system was a quick way of mapping the tones in the picture that he wanted as 'pure white', 'pure black' and all the zones in-between onto the final print, by varying both the exposure and the development time of the negative. So by under- or over-exposing, and marking the single undeveloped negative appropriately, he could he could develop the negative to pretty much the optimum darkness without having to constantly inspect it under the safelight. It would have the correct tonal range for the paper he knew he was going to print it on, and from there it was 'only' a matter of tweaking the final print, at which he was also a master. It was his desire to consistently map the tonal range he was interested in, and 'pre-visualised', as he put it, onto his favourite paper, led to the zone system.

As others have said, it's not directly applicable in the digital era as there is no negative, just a raw file whose curves can be adjusted at will. But his basic insights about pre-visualisation, of actively deciding what tones in the photo will be pure black, pure white etc. in the final print, and both exposing and post-processing accordingly, are still valid.

share|improve this answer

Here is another introduction to the Zone System from Luminous Landscape. And here is a simplified introduction for the digital age from Norman Koren which I bookmarked some time ago.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.