Eva

Eva

by Petr Újezdský

submit your photo


Picture of the Week Themes
Suggest and vote on themes

Win a Lifehacker Syndication contest!

I often hear studio photographers talk about 'Rembrandt Lighting' when they're setting up lights and doing studio portrait photography. What is Rembrandt Lighting, and when do I use it?

link|improve this question

6  
Keep this stuff coming - VERY HELPFUL. – rfusca Jan 9 '11 at 3:36
feedback

3 Answers

up vote 42 down vote accepted

What is Rembrandt Lighting?

Rembrandt Lighting is one of the 5 basic lighting setups used in studio portrait photography. There are two things that make up Rembrandt Lighting… A light on one half the face, and a triangle of light on the shadowed side of the face (called a chiaroscuro, but only lighting nerds need to remember that… most of us just call it ‘the triangle shadow’). If it’s ‘real’ Rembrandt lighting, the triangle shadow should be no wider than the eye, and no longer than the nose. The thing that distinguishes Rembrandt Lighting from simple short lighting is the triangle of light (also see 'In portrait photography, what is 'broad' lighting? What is 'short' lighting'). That’s the technical…

In the real world, when it comes to portrait photography, Rembrandt Lighting is often confused with Short Lighting and is used as loose shorthand for ‘using a single light source to light roughly half the face, while leaving the other half of the face in some level of shadow.’ This is because it can often be quite 'fiddly' to get the triangle of light just right on a subject.

Rembrandt lighting at its most basic level is constructed with a single light source placed approximately 45 degrees offset from the subject and a bit higher than eye level, lighting the side of the face that is farthest from the camera.

One-light Rembrandt Lighting setup:

Basic one-light Rembrandt Lighting setup diagram Basic one-light Rembrandt Lighting setup example

Often times the single light source is augmented with a reflector or another light placed approximately 45 degrees offset to the shadowed side of the face and at ½ the power of the main light source (called the key light). This is used to lighten the shadows on the dark side of the face.

One-light with reflector Rembrandt Lighting setup:

Basic one-light Rembrandt Lighting setup with reflector diagram Basic one-light Rembrandt Lighting setup with reflector example

When do I use Rembrandt Lighting?

One of the reasons many photographers use Rembrandt Lighting is that it is relatively simple to set up, and requires only a single light source (though it’s often supplemented with a reflector in order to bring detail back into the shadows on the subject’s face). This lighting pattern works well for subjects will full or round faces (because it adds definition and slims the face), but is generally not a good choice for narrow faces. Often times ‘old school’ photographers will refer to Rembrandt Lighting as ‘masculine’ and some really old school portrait photographers will insist that a woman should never be lit with Rembrandt Lighting. This seems to be a relatively arbitrary distinction, however, and since Rembrandt himself painted women using basic Rembrandt Lighting, it’s safe to say that this ‘rule’ is a ‘guideline’ at best, and is something that many photographers regularly ignore.

link|improve this answer
Does Rembrandt lighting have to be short? Could you keep the subject and light static, but photograph more from the lit side, thus making a broad Rembrandt lighting setup? – Evan Krall Jan 8 '11 at 8:27
2  
Well, short and broad are their own distinct styles of lighting. Rembrandt is just Rembrandt whichever side you place in the shadow. That aside, it is generally more difficult and 'fiddly' to light the side closest to the camera for two reasons, the first is that the 45-degree thing doesn't work the same if you're lighting closest to the camera, the correct angle is more like 65 degrees off axis from the subject, which is harder to just eyeball. The second is that because the nose is covering a good chunk of the triangle of light, you have to position the camera juuuust right – Jay Lance Photography Jan 8 '11 at 9:44
...in order for the camera to be able to see it, and if you rotate the camera around the axis of your subject too far you end up catching the light (or a nasty lens flare) in your shot. The real power of the basic Rembrandt setup is that a monkey can set Rembrandt lighting up in its sleep with one arm tied behind its back. You can get some interesting results by reversing it, but you take away everything that's 'easy' about the setup when you do. That's not a reason not to do it (necessarily), just something to be aware of before you go in... – Jay Lance Photography Jan 8 '11 at 9:47
@Jay Lance Photography - What software are you using to do the diagrams? – rfusca Jan 9 '11 at 3:36
1  
@Jay Lance Photography - flickr.com/photos/55358132@N05/5338348966 – rfusca Jan 9 '11 at 6:12
show 9 more comments
feedback

One reason to use Rembrandt lighting is to contrast the subject lighting with the background to obtain a chiaroscuro effect (strong contrasts, shape defining light). The dark side of the face is defined in silhouette against a bright(er) background:

Here two lights are used, one for the subject and one for the background. The background light is placed close and to an angle so as to fade out across the subject. Here's the setup:

This can be done with one light if you place it just right so that the subject itself shades part of the background. Here's another example of the same set up:

And for contrast, here is a Rembrandt setup with no background light, notice how the unlit side is not defined and gets lost in the background. This gives the photo a different appearance, less striking due to the lack of background contrast and more withdrawn as the subject fades out.

link|improve this answer
2  
Excellent examples. – Evan Krall Jan 8 '11 at 22:03
1  
Great answer. Awesome pics! – Jay Lance Photography Jan 9 '11 at 0:39
2  
These are great examples and inspired me to try a lighting on the background similarly. Thanks! – rfusca Jan 9 '11 at 7:11
A little innapropriate. – J. Walker Mar 28 at 23:36
feedback

Due to our wonderful population on photo.stackexchange, the above answers are comprehensive and extremely useful. I just wanted to chime in with the historical/etymological perspective.(mostly because Rembrandt is my favorite artist)

I just wanted to give a few striking examples of Rembrandt using this style in his paintings. Self Portrait as a Young Man in 1629

Here you notice the single off-axis light source. Compare with the first of Matt Grum's photos. Same light pattern on the face, although in Rembrandts "Self Portrait as a Young Man in 1629" the background light shares a side with the face light. This works for Rembrandt because he allows this background light to stretch to the other darker side also.

As a second example Self portrait 1657 Here is an example from 1657 with the background light on the dark side, and a higher face-light. Similar to Matt Grum's second photo.

link|improve this answer
feedback

Your Answer

 
or
required, but never shown

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.