I Dare You!

by peter_budo

submit your photo

Hall of Fame
View past winners from this year

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Take the 2-minute tour ×
Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Before I got into photography, I used to use disposable cameras with ISO 400 film. I've gotten some decent results in various lighting, both inside and outside and at different focus distances. How do they seem to work so well despite having no control over exposure or focus (beyond using flash)?

share|improve this question
I don't know if it's really a duplicate, since this question clearly states that everything is fixed. But Matt Grum's answer there does cover this question too. –  mattdm Jul 23 '14 at 11:58
With similar wording, I should add — I promise I didn't lift it, but it's very possible I subconsciously remembered Matt's older answer in writing mine. –  mattdm Jul 23 '14 at 13:40

1 Answer 1

up vote 13 down vote accepted

Three things:

  1. Film is relatively lenient, and exposure variations are handled in the printing.
  2. The lens has a relatively small fixed aperture and focus is set at a reasonable distance to get a lot of depth of field.
  3. Finally, prints from these things are usually 4×6, and not subjected to a high degree of scrutiny — we basically expect them to be relatively poor.
share|improve this answer
I would say that exposure variations are handled in the printing, rather than the developing. (You could do a snip test to adjust development, but I don't think many people who use disposable cameras are going to do that.) –  coneslayer Jul 25 '14 at 23:37
@coneslayer You're probably right. In this digital age it all gets lumped together. :) –  mattdm Jul 25 '14 at 23:54

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.