Alley in Pisa, Italy

by Lars Kotthoff

submit your photo


Hall of Fame
View past winners from this year

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Take the 2-minute tour ×
Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

What is considered high quality bokeh and what is considered low quality bokeh?

share|improve this question

3 Answers 3

up vote 6 down vote accepted

Good or bad bokeh is in the eye of the beholder. Michael Clark thinks the highlights have to be round, usually meaning a fully open aperture, but I don't agree. I don't mind 7-gon or 9-gon highlights, though round one do look nicer.

An aspect of bokeh which bothers me more than the general shape is the light distribution. For me the best bokeh is when the highlights are lit evenly, , contrary to brighter at the center or the rim. An extreme example of this is a mirror lens bokeh. Since the bokeh highlights mirror (no pun intended) the shape of the lens' aperture, and since in a mirror lens the center is blocked the highlights are donut shaped. Take a look at this example:

enter image description here

(I don't know who the photographer is.) Here an otherwise beautiful picture is IMO ruined by the mirror lens bokeh, in particular on the boy's bermuda shorts.

Like I said, it's a personal thing.

share|improve this answer
1  
Actually it is not only I that think so. It is the multitude of lens reviewers that rate lenses in terms of their ability to produce smooth bokeh. It is the even greater numbers of users who are willing to pay more for a lens that produces smooth versus harsh bokeh. The same light spreading optical properties that produce round, smooth out-of-focus highlights also produce even, smooth, creamy bokeh in the non-highlights. –  Michael Clark Jul 5 at 15:12
1  
Good lenses produce smooth bokeh stopped down because they have many aperture blades that are curved to produced near circular shapes, even when stopped down. If one can only get round bokeh when shooting wide open, why would I spend much of my answer on how the number and shape of the aperture blades affect bokeh? –  Michael Clark Jul 5 at 15:36
    
the doughnut shape from mirror lenses is in fact part of what we are talking about with "the shape of the bokeh". –  Michael Nielsen Jul 5 at 21:49
    
@MichaelNielsen - IMO the "shape" refers to the contours, caused by the diaphragm blades, while the donut is caused by unequal distribution of light over the highlights. It's an extreme case, but there are other cases of bokeh where the center is slightly brighter, for instance. –  stevenvh Jul 6 at 10:32
    
to me the shape is the contours, inner (if present) and outer, and the texture incl. light distribution. –  Michael Nielsen Jul 6 at 10:42

In general "high quality" bokeh is viewed by most photographers as out of focus areas that are smooth rather than harsh. Most lenses that produce smooth bokeh also produce out-of-focus highlights that are round rather than an equiangular regular convex polygon. Since lenses that produce round out of focus highlights with soft edges also tend to produce smoother out of focus areas in general this is one of the easiest ways to evaluate the quality of bokeh that a lens produces.

"Low quality" bokeh is viewed as out of focus areas that have harsh transitions from the blur of one out-of-focus object to another. Lenses with harsh bokeh also tend to to produce out of focus highlights that are not round. Some may also produce round out-of-focus highlights that have very hard edges or are even brighter near the edge than the center which also tends to make the bokeh very harsh for all out-of-focus areas.

Compare the shape of a five-sided regular polygon here: enter image description here

to the shape of a nine-sided regular polygon here: enter image description here

Even with straight sides it is obvious how much closer to circular the nine sided figure appears than the five-sided one. Lenses that produce "high quality" bokeh usually have aperture blades that are curved which allows the opening to be even closer to a circular shape than those with straight edges.

The shape of the bokeh is determined by the shape of the aperture diaphragm. Circular bokeh is possible when the diaphragm blades are curved and form a near-circle at a particular aperture setting. Most lenses that can produce round bokeh have nine or more individual aperture blades that are curved. Lenses with fewer blades tend to produce rougher bokeh. Often the aperture blades in lenses with fewer of them are not curved. Even if they are curved the angles change too much from one aperture setting to the next so there is only one setting that allows the curve of each blade to match the curve of the adjacent blades and form an almost circular opening.

There are some lenses which do not place any aperture blades in the light path when set to the widest setting. The Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II is one such lens. The bokeh is much smoother when shot wide open at f/1.8 than when shot stopped down with five aperture blades in the light path. As with most lenses, shooting the EF 50mm f/1.8 wide open to get smoother bokeh also means sacrificing some in-focus sharpness compared to using narrower apertures.

share|improve this answer

High quality is when it fits the vision and intent of the photographer and it enhances the aesthetics of the image. Bad quality is when it subtracts from the overall quality/aesthetics of the photo and for technical reasons does not match the photographer's intent.

In general, the intent of bokeh is to make a smooth background against a sharp foreground. Good bokeh lenses make a smooth background, while bad ones make a "busy" bokeh. This takes attention away form the subject, which is generally considered bad.

Sometimes the photographer might want to use the "bad" one for a particular artistic reason. The important thing is that it is done as an informed choice. examples of busy bokeh that people seek are some cult vintage lenses that have a "swirly" bokeh, like the Russian ones. While e.g. Zeiss and Pentax vintage lenses are very smooth.

Then there's also the case of "bokeh balls", some are very uniform (good) or dissipate towards the edges (good), others are doughnuts or have dots in them (bad). Some are really round , some are pentagons, hexagons, and some are like shurikens then stopped down a bit. In general round ones are desired. Again creative choices may differ.

You can check out differences in bokeh looks on different sites:

http://www.ronscheffler.com/techtalk/?p=217

http://www.wlcastleman.com/equip/reviews/50mm/bokeh/bokeh.htm

http://www.rickdenney.com/bokeh_test.htm

There's examples of busy and creamy bokehs amongst these.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.