Time to be with your loved ones

Time to be with loved ones

by sat

submit your photo


Hall of Fame
View past winners from this year

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Take the 2-minute tour ×
Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Due to weight restrictions I cannot take my tripod on my next foreign trip. What are the alternatives?

share|improve this question
add comment

16 Answers

up vote 15 down vote accepted

Several people have mentioned beanbags and such which are nice, if you want to spend a few bucks on a dedicated solution based on the beanbag concept then check out The Pod series of "beanbags with camera mounts". I have been using one for a few years and they are great and don't take up much room.

share|improve this answer
add comment

The Gorillapod range are quite portable tripods, with the added benefit of 'attach anywhere' - at least places you won't get a conventional tripod!

share|improve this answer
    
I own a couple Gorillapods (SLR & SLR-Zoom) and love them. –  Andrew Jul 15 '10 at 19:28
    
Indeed those Gorillapods are great! –  Marc Jul 15 '10 at 20:59
    
A leg keeps popping off my SLR Gorillapod and now I don't trust it with anything other than cheap flashes. It also has become much looser over time... –  matt burns Jul 16 '10 at 9:50
    
I agree. I have a Gorillapod that I use with my SLR and love it. –  Bruno Girin Jul 16 '10 at 10:16
3  
After my Gorillapod dropped my camera twice (luckily onto soft surfaces), I'm very hesitant to recommend them. –  Endareth May 24 '11 at 0:24
show 1 more comment

You can use a monopod as a lighter, but still sturdy alternative. Small legs for the point at the bottom can serve to help steady you, although it's no replacement for a proper tripod.

GorillaPods are an option, as mentioned by others.

I actually like to use a beanbag when I'm tight for space; it turns almost any surface into a usable camera mount.

share|improve this answer
    
I concur ... you can get an inexpensive monopod that's very light and collapse to a around 18" (probably less). –  david Jul 15 '10 at 19:34
    
+1 for the bean bag suggestion. –  Marc Jul 15 '10 at 21:00
    
monopod indeed. The photographer's Swiss Army Knife. Camera support, cane, billy club, and occasional stick to swipe away overhanging branches and cobwebs. –  jwenting May 26 '11 at 7:00
add comment

You can fake the tripod with few metres of string. Instructions here.

share|improve this answer
    
interesting idea - never heard of that before –  danio Jul 16 '10 at 7:59
    
I have been meaning to try this out for a while. Its so simple, I cant wait to see how effective it is :) –  Nippysaurus Aug 16 '12 at 3:39
add comment

Perhaps not applicable in all scenarios, but taking sequences of photos as the maximum speed possible in your camera (say around 5 or so frames) can act as a "stabilizer". Out of such a series, one frame tends to be pretty sharp, even at rather slow shutter speeds.

share|improve this answer
add comment

If you are so weight restricted that even a Gorillapod wouldn't make it, then look for the more stable support you can get reach of that would allow you to place your camera in the approximate position you want to shoot from.

When indoors, tables, chairs and walls are good candidates. When outdoors, look for posts, branches, rocks or other natural platforms.

If your camera allows, lock the exposure (and eventually the focus) before placing the camera on its chosen place. Remember to check if the camera is out of slipping danger.

Also, if your camera has the options for that, turn off image stabilization, turn on the self timer (2 seconds are enough for shots you don't plan to be part of, 10 seconds otherwise), and press the shutter.

It never hurts to take more than one shot on those occasions, just in case. :o)

share|improve this answer
    
My assumption is that the current tripod that Rowland has is a full size one. The Gorillapod SLR (or smaller models depending on the camera) are quite small and light compared to normal, full-size tripods. –  Andrew Jul 15 '10 at 19:52
add comment

Consider investing in lenses with image stabilisation, or a camera body with stabilisation depending on the brand and type of camera that you use. Even on wide angle lenses I've had good use of my stabilized lenses in places where I could not take a tripod not only because of transport restrictions, but also because of local restrictions on site.

share|improve this answer
    
(re: Restrictions) Like in cave tours. A flash may make the scene boring and a tripod/monopod would get the tour leader to yell at you. But hand-held with auto-ISO and stabilization (and shooting a few shots to pick the sharpest) can yield usable results. –  Jared Updike Jul 15 '10 at 20:52
    
This idea is not going to work when using longer exposure! –  Nitin Kumar Aug 6 '12 at 16:35
    
I've had success up to a full second exposure. How long do you need? –  Dave Van den Eynde Aug 6 '12 at 20:03
add comment

You can bring a small gorilla pod, or my preference, a little collapsible monopod. monopods are great because they offer a lot of monitored support, but are quite compact and lightweight. My mom even bungees hers to available supports and uses the timer mode to take "afk" pictures.

share|improve this answer
    
can you please define "afk"? it's an acronym i'm not familiar with... –  bobp Jul 22 '10 at 16:33
1  
away from keyboard (meaning not at the tripod) –  reuscam Jul 23 '10 at 1:13
add comment

If you're going to be hiking, many walking / hiking sticks have a camera compatible screw mount under the handle.

share|improve this answer
add comment

A beanbag doesn't take too much space in your bag.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Scott Bourne has recommended using a bean bag as an alternative, and for traveling he takes a bag/sock then fills it with beans/rice/etc. when he gets there.

share|improve this answer
add comment

I bought a Trekpod this spring, and I like it a lot. I took it on a 10-day canoe trip to Canada, and I really appreciated a piece of equipment that did double duty. If you haven't seen one, it's a walking stick of sorts with tripod legs that fold out at the bottom. It's not quite as stable as a full-sized tripod, so it's more susceptible to swaying in the wind, and it's not as good on uneven ground as a full-featured tripod, but it folds into a very functional walking stick when you're not using it as a tripod.

Most of the landscapes in this gallery were taken on the Trekpod, and I'm certain that most of them wouldn't have turned out due to the long exposures I needed (see some of the sunset pics).

share|improve this answer
add comment

Just to round out the entries here -- if weight is a concern (and not "nopod" zones), then you'd have to be pretty tight on the limits not to have room for the Zipshot. It's not something I'd use as an everyday tripod, but if you think of it as a stabilizer (you'll need to be hands-on in order to avoid mirror and shutter vibrations) it'll get you a couple of stops you wouldn't have otherwise.

As far as I can tell, the idea came from those collapsible feeler canes for the blind -- it's essentially three of them attached to a mini ball head. It's a bit spindly, no question about it, and you wouldn't want to use it with a heavy lens, but it feels at least as good as the Cullman Magic 1 I used years ago, and at 11oz (312g) and 15" folded it's certainly portable enough.

share|improve this answer
add comment

I've used a combination of gorilla pod + walking stick with some success (my walking sticks are not equipped with a screw mount) It's a more flexible setup than just the gorilla pod, or just a monopod.

share|improve this answer
add comment

A new product, HandlePod, may work for your purpose. It is small, light (4 oz.) and can be use where tripods are not allowed. It is a handle topped by a 3-axis rotating camera mount and backed by four rubber feet. Hold it against any available solid object for tripod-like stability. Check it out at www.handlepod.com.

share|improve this answer
1  
Welcome to Stack Exchange. Are you associated with the company that makes this product? (That's fine, but disclosure is required. See the site FAQ on product promotion.) Thanks! –  mattdm Dec 1 '11 at 9:48
add comment

I recently bought a Horusbennu monopod. It weighs 0.9 lbs, and is able to hold my D7000 + 30mm without any issues.

enter image description here

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.