I am comparing the Sony A7 to the new Sony a6000.
If you look at these two Flickr sets of images, you can see that, in general, the A7 have consistently more "pop" to them. Certainly, there are quite a few pieces of gold with great "pop" in the a6000 set as well.
The camera's are relatively comparable in terms of MP. The a7 kit does come with a Zeiss lens, vs a Sony kit lens on the A6000. The a7 is full frame, and the A6000 is APS-C.
Is it just because the Sony-A7 is a better camera (bigger sensor, etc), or is it more likely that those who spend $2,000 for a camera are more technical and know how to take better shots and do better processing before posting them to flickr.
If I return my A6000, and buy an A7 will I start getting shots that are comparable to what I see in the Sony A7 pool on Flickr vs the a6000 pool?
There are many photos in the A6000 pool that look amazing and comparable to what's in the A7 pool - I can't get that close with any of my photos on the a6000.
There were some websites that showed photo comparisons on the same subjects between the A7 and A6000 and the differences were slight and certainly not as broad as shown in the two Flickr sets.