Shadowy Daisy

Shadowy Daisy
by damned-truths

Submit your Photo
Hall of Fame

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

How does one prepare night-time photographs (long exposures of starfields, moonlight, city lights, etc.) for printing? Do particular paper types (e.g. metallic) work better for this purpose?

As it is, normal daytime photographs print much darker than they appear on monitors (since paper doesn't emit its own light). I'm wondering how to print inherently dark photos without losing shadow detail entirely.

Or do dark photos just need to be displayed under really bright lighting?

share|improve this question
Its not a complete answer so I wont submit one: Paper is VERY important for dark images. I have found that glossy / lustre media is best for giving really deep blacks (you want black to be BLACK don't you!) and quality matters - I have seen various cheap photo papers that produce a sort of slightly milky haze where ink is very heavy. – Digital Lightcraft Feb 24 '14 at 15:07
Yes, the Dmax of glossy paper is higher than that of matte paper, allowing "deeper" blacks. – FredP Feb 24 '14 at 16:12

Unless your photo is almost completely made of very dark tones (on purpose), why would you handle it differently of a "normal" (daylight) one, since it is correctly exposed ?

Provided you have handled your photo well during post-processing, trying to keep the histogram balanced, and your graphic chain is correctly calibrated, you should obtain (as) good prints (as with "normal" photos).

Just two points you might want to watch about paper :

  • As indicated above, a (good quality) glossy paper might be more flattering because it will allow the dark colors to be "deeper" (than on a matte paper, because of the Dmax, see here for example)... and then a specific artistic intent might kick in and contradict this statement (and I know some people who prefer matte papers, no matter what).
  • However, glossy paper is... glossy :-) so imagine if you display your photos in an exhibition with inadequate lighting, the result can be catastrophic - especially with darker images. Semi-glossy paper can be an intermediary solution (my favorite usually).
  • If you have thin light details within large dark areas, you need a paper with well controlled ink diffusion, otherwise these details will be lost (blurred). Again glossy papers usually fare better here.

In English I found this page that seems accurate on papers :

share|improve this answer

Two words: soft proofing. Just remember that most high quality monitors can display a wider gamut, both in terms of range of colors and dynamic range, than most printers. When you soft proof with a color profile for the intended printer/ink/paper combination you limit the gamut of the display to what the printer can reproduce. You may not be able to reproduce an image with a printer the way you can see the version before you do soft proofing on your wide gamut display, but you can see how that image will be translated to fit in the capabilities of the printer. Depending on what application you use, you may also be able to define how out of gamut values are translated into values within the capabilities of the printer/ink/paper.

This comprehensive article covers the workflow one artist uses to print her HDR images. This includes what software, printers, and inks work for her.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.