Serene Life

by garik

submit your photo


Hall of Fame
View past winners from this year

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Take the 2-minute tour ×
Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am trying to take pictures of small and large rugs. I have Canon 6D with 24-70mm lens. Could you please suggest the best way for mounting the camera to the ceiling, and any other recommendations for my camera/lens setup?

The ceiling has steel supports with height around 12ft (3.6 metres).

There are about 4000 rugs, small and too large. the use case for photos is for uploading in website for customers

share|improve this question
    
What's the use case for these photos? Unless you're going to be making poster-size prints, you can almost certainly get away with a much smaller camera than a 6D which is therefore going to be easier to mount. –  Philip Kendall Feb 3 at 8:29
2  
Similarly, how big are "large" and "small" rugs? –  Philip Kendall Feb 3 at 8:30
    
There are about 4000 rugs, small and too large. the use case for photos is for uploading in website for customers. i have also another body: Canon 450D –  user25807 Feb 4 at 6:07
    
Would be helpful to know how large is "too large"... in whatever units, I mean. I have seen carpets of 10m of length... –  Rmano Feb 5 at 15:45

3 Answers 3

Mounting the rugs on a suitably sized and sloped flat board and the camera on a high floor stand would probably be easier than mounting the camera on the ceiling where it will be inaccessible and difficult to control.

Frankly though you're going to have to move, unroll, photograph, rollup, and replace each rug so exactly how you do that efficiently takes precedence in what makes things easiest.

To save you a lot of effort you might want to consider other options for the website such as displaying close up images of the rug pattern, showing them in situ in a posed scenario, or grouping similar rugs together. It all depends on the type and style of the rugs.

share|improve this answer
2  
I think it might depend on the sizes and weights of the rugs. –  Michael Clark Feb 3 at 11:44
    
A large-size carpet can be wider than a person's tall. And if these are high-quality, thick-weave carpets they also easily weigh as much as a person. So it unfortunately indeed depends on how big is 'too large' and how many there are. –  Cornelius Feb 4 at 16:22

With a full-frame camera like the 6D, and a 24mm focal length (widest you've got there), and a maximum subject-distance of 12ft (3.6m), you'd be able to fit a rug of up to 3.6 x 5.4 metres (12ft by 18ft) in the frame.

You can adjust calculations here, if that isn't big enough (note that this will calculate the vertical field-of-view, i.e. the maximum rug-width, or you can ask it the required focal length for a given view-size and subject distance). If that is insufficient, then you could try getting a 17-40mm f/4L or 16-35mm f/2.8L for significantly wider field of view.

share|improve this answer
    
If i use half frame camera like Canon 450D, how can i calculate it? –  user25807 Feb 4 at 6:13
    
Using a smaller sensor will reduce the field of view. You can multiply the focal length of the lens by the crop factor (here 1.6) of the camera to get the effective focal length for a full frame camera. It sounds like you need all the field of view you can get, so a full frame camera is the way to go. –  Ross Millikan Feb 6 at 0:41
    
@user25807, the Canon 450D has a sensor height of 14.8mm, so you can adjust that parameter in the linked WolframAlpha calculator. As Ross notes, the 6D's sensor is 1.6x larger in each dimension, and thus the FOV is also 1.6x larger for the 6D compared to the 450D. –  drfrogsplat Feb 6 at 1:55

If you have freedom to move the rugs, the easiest solution could be to temporarily hang them from a wall and the simply photograph them straight on horizontally.

If the rugs must be photographed in place, one cheap and easy solution would be to stand on a ladder along the middle of one edge of the rug, pointing the camera downward. This will of course result in converging lines, making the rug appear like a trapezoid. This can be corrected in post processing by using the perspective correction feature of software like Lightroom, typically used to correct the converging lines of the similar geometric situation of tilting a camera upward to photograph a building. You may be able to avoid the post processing step by resting a tilt-shift lens and using it to correct the converging lines in the camera.

The Gorillapod SLR-Zoom is a tripod with flexible legs that can be securely mounted anywhere it's legs can wrap around, so if the ceiling has anything in approximately the right location that a Gorillapod could attach to, this could be a relatively inexpensive solution for mounting the camera directly above the rug. Since the camera might be quite awkward to control in this location, it may be necessary to tether it to a computer with Canon's EOS Utility software.

share|improve this answer
    
The camera could be tethered to a computer with Canon's EOS Utility software, if it was hard to access when mounted to the ceiling/supports. –  drfrogsplat Feb 3 at 9:15
    
Or, if the light is consistent from shot to shot the camera could be set manually and then triggered by a remote trigger such as a PocketWizard, a YN-622C, or even some of Canon's wireless flash system that can operate as a shutter trigger. –  Michael Clark Feb 3 at 11:43
    
There are about 4000 rugs, small and too large. it's too hard hanging them from a wall. –  user25807 Feb 4 at 6:11

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.