Spring 2012

Spring 2012
by ani

Submit your Photo
Hall of Fame

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I came across this guy's work and love the look and how clean it is. Besides removing the saturation, and strong clarity, what else is involved in getting this type of clean and detailed look?

http://westarca.tumblr.com/post/72285809439/harlem-nights-photography-by-wes-tarca http://westarca.tumblr.com/post/71278876613/the-great-bridge-photography-by-wes-tarca

share|improve this question
Clean = low noise? Something else? Please clarify. – dpollitt Jan 22 '14 at 23:36
what do you mean by removing saturation? those don't look desaturated to me – MikeW Jan 23 '14 at 0:08
Might be some compositing in there as well. On the first image the video billboard in the background to the left looks a little cleaner than I would expect for an image that had to have a relatively long exposure. I am also impressed by the clean white balance across the image, I find it a real challenge when shooting long exposures in cities with all the different color lights. – Patrick Hurley Jan 23 '14 at 4:59
There appears to be a lot of compositing going on, and some very subtle but effective localized tone mapping (once referred to as 'dodging and burning' and more recently called single exposure HDR). – Michael Clark Jan 23 '14 at 5:12
Makes sense that there may be some compositing going on. – Xavier Daniels Jan 23 '14 at 21:41

What exactly do you mean by 'clean'?

From what I can tell, the post-processing they've used has included:

  • Reducing orange street light cast either by using the temperature slider or red curves
  • Boosted contrast
  • Probably some image sharpening
  • As has been mentioned in the comments, compositing has also probably been used

Oh, and the starburst effects around the stationary lights were achieved by using a small aperture (large f-number)

share|improve this answer
Thanks I'll give that a try. And yes the starburst are from it being a long exposure. – Xavier Daniels Jan 23 '14 at 21:41
Actually the starbursts are due directly to the aperture being small. I presume this is because the light passes through a small hole which is actually polygonal. – Binary Funt Jan 23 '14 at 21:52

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.