Spring 2012

Spring 2012
by ani

Submit your Photo
Hall of Fame

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Different Canon cameras offer next to RAW also M-RAW and S-RAW. These file formats feature a lower resolution but also a significantly smaller file size.

Is it possible to shoot RAW files with all their advantages and convert them into M-RAW or S-RAW files later, if there is no need for full resolution in a subset of photos? Is there software available for this task?

share|improve this question

It's theoretically possible to do so but I doubt any software implements this currently.


mRAW and sRAW are both ways to compress images that attempt to preserve as much if the editing latitude as possible. If you've decided a group of images aren't worth preserving in RAW but you have processed them then JPEG is a much better space saving strategy preserving both resolution and image quality (but not editing latitude).

The desire to convert to m/sRAW at a later date just doesn't make sense to me: you've decided that a set of images are not worth preserving at RAW filesizes & printing at high resolution, but you want to preserve the ability to change your mind about white balance at a later date. If you think you might reprocess images to make them better then it seems worth investing in small increase in storage space to keep the original RAWs.

share|improve this answer
I keep all my RAW files, they are not removed in favour of their JPEG output. I want to keep smaller versions of some RAW files without losing editing capabilities. They might be edited at a later date, but not e.g. for high resolution prints. This makes sense to me for a significant part of my family photos. ;-) – lejonet Jan 13 '14 at 20:39
Having used m/sRAW for a while back when I first purchased my 7D, the editing latitude is really not that much more than your average TIFF. In some respects, given that m/sRAW are 14-bit encoded, they actually have less. A standard RAW image has VASTLY superior editing latitude than any of mRAW, sRAW, or TIFF. If one wishes to save space, use of m/sRAW is a great way to do it, but if you need editing latitude, I highly recommend against using either. – jrista Jan 14 '14 at 21:05

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.