Time to be with your loved ones

Time to be with loved ones

by sat

submit your photo

Hall of Fame
View past winners from this year

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Take the 2-minute tour ×
Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

With the new line of mirrorless cameras being announced this fall, the gap between DSLR and mirrorless cameras continue to close. There are many generic discussions comparing the two, but as a portrait photographer, I'm not needing a complex AF tracking (sports), every action with a dedicated button (wedding), super high ISO capabilities for the candlelight situations (wedding again), or +200mm lenses (wildlife).

Like any photographer, portrait photographers want sharp quality, rugged cameras (for on-site portraits), variety of lenses, etc. Portrait photographers particularly like strobe compatibility, wide apertures (bokeh), and possibly tethering capabilities.

As a portrait photographer, what all should a person consider?

share|improve this question
good question! I don't do portraits but it will be good to read the answers. –  Paul Cezanne Oct 24 '13 at 23:15
Lack of shallow DoF options(lens selection+sensor size)is my main reason, followed closely by accurate and fast AF. Both have been improved greatly with the most recent announcements, giving me less of a reason to keep my huge kit around. –  dpollitt Oct 25 '13 at 14:54
add comment

4 Answers

up vote 14 down vote accepted

A few aspects mentioned in your question will be our starting point. Please note, we are not saying each of these issues will be determining factors for every photographer. We're not saying one system is better than the other because of... a or b. Rather they are a response to the question, "...what all should a person consider?" Once considered, each of these aspects may or may not lead a particular portraitist to choose one system over the other.

  • Focus System You may not need a super fast, complex, and configurable focus system like a sports photographer does, but you do need one that is consistently accurate unless you are manually focusing all of your shots. Unless you are shooting tethered and on a tripod, just seeing the scene well enough to manually focus a mirrorless camera can be a challenge. The lenses are designed around the assumption of AF and may be difficult to adjust in finer increments. Each camera/lens' shot to shot variation also plays a big role when you are shooting at the wide apertures typically used in current portraiture. Is the Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Camera (MILC) you are considering consistent re: focus accuracy from shot to shot? Are the lenses as stable as heavier DSLR type lenses in terms of holding focus? Will using heavy DSLR lenses via an adapter on the MILC increase the risk of tweaking the mount?
  • Dedicated Buttons This really depends on your shooting style. A lot of portraitists use a back body button to meter and/or focus, or a dial or joystick to select various focus points. If doing environmental portraits, the conditions can change every bit as fast as those at a wedding, since many wedding photos are essentially environmental portraits.
  • High ISO Capabilities This also depends a lot on what types of portraits you shoot. It is not much of a factor in controlled studio lighting or outdoor daylight shoots, but what about outdoor night settings or other environmental types of portraits when you want to balance the dim ambient lighting with your controlled lighting?
  • Long Telephoto Lenses Lenses beyond 200mm are not usually a factor when doing portraiture, but for tight facial framing 135mm or even 180-200mm is not unreasonable. And to get that smooth bokeh your customer expects, you are going to need a fairly fast telephoto lens. If there is even a 180mm f/2 equivalent MILC lens available, it will be about the same size/weight as the DSLR counterparts, so where is the MILC advantage?
  • Resolution Sharpness is much more about the glass than the sensor most of the time. You can put the same 20+ MP FF sensor in a MILC, but if you don't have glass just as good, the DSLR with better glass will still outperform it. It is often possible to use "Pro" lenses on a MILC via adapter, but the added size and weight of those lenses remove the biggest advantage of the MILC systems.
  • Ruggedness If you do outdoor portraits or other types of environmental portraiture, weather sealing and environmental resistance should be a consideration. Most pro level DSLR bodies and lenses, and even consumer level models such as a few by Pentax, are much more capable in this area than the current crop of mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras (MILC) on the market. This is especially true in terms of the lenses made specifically for the mirrorless systems. And while it is often possible to use "Pro" lenses on a MILC via adapter, the added size and weight of those lenses remove the biggest advantage of the MILC systems. In terms of body durability and ruggedness, at this point in the game there is not much comparison between the Nikon D4 or Canon 1D X and the top MILCs. You can take those pro bodies and use them in places that would bring the MILCs to their knees, if not totally destroy them. Not an issue if you are in the studio, but a big one if you are doing environmental portraits in extreme environments.
  • Lens Selection It only takes one lens to make a portrait. But if you need a lens to do something none of the lenses designed for MILC systems can, there is almost certainly a Canon/Nikon/Sony/Pentax/Zeiss lens that can. As we've already repeated, using the full size lenses on a MILC removes one of the significant advantages of the MILC concept.
  • Strobe Compatibility Another aspect to consider is how capable a MILC is at controlling multiple off-camera flashes via the camera's menu. This is something the Nikon CLS does very well. Canon bodies also have a lot of capability in this area and are gaining ground on Nikon with the release of the radio controlled (vs. optically controlled) 600EX-RT. Other full size DSLRs also do this to one degree or the other. This is something every "location" portrait photographer should consider essential. Can the MILC system you are considering do this?
  • Bokeh To get the creamiest bokeh you need a large sensor and a fast lens with smooth aperture blades. Can your MILC lenses do that? There are a few that can, and a few new MILC systems include a FF sensor. But can any MILC system lens touch the results of using a lens such as the Canon EF 85mm f/1.2 L II?
  • Tethering Since tethering is related to firmware and software compatibility, it shouldn't take much for manufacturers to include this capability for MILC systems that don't already have it. The question, though, is will the marketplace demand it?
share|improve this answer
Don't forget the ability to tether, very handy in the studio. –  John Cavan Oct 25 '13 at 0:20
Tethering was covered in the question. –  Michael Clark Oct 25 '13 at 0:23
Still something to consider. :) –  John Cavan Oct 25 '13 at 0:30
I'd vote up again if I could! –  John Cavan Oct 25 '13 at 1:20
@JamesSnell in general, yes. In the context of the question regarding usage for portraiture, not nearly as much as they would be shooting sports/action/astronomy/etc. –  Michael Clark Oct 26 '13 at 22:23
show 6 more comments

I've heard a couple pro photographers talk about how the DSLR commands a certain kind of respect from clients that they wouldn't get with a mirrorless system and I've seen this first hand as well. I was running a 60d w/grip and 70-200 F/2.8 and people thought I was some hotshot pro. So if you want to charge a lot people want to feel they're getting their money's worth and DSLRs help convey quality when they don't know any better.

share|improve this answer
add comment

The advantages of a DSLR over a mirrorless interchangeable lens camera (MILC) for portraiture are starting to vanish, with the latest releases it's pretty much limited to:

  • Optical viewfinder is sharper, better in contrasty light and low light, offers instant feedback and better battery life.

  • Ergonomics are usually better, especially for larger lenses.

  • Compatibility with flash systems and tethering.

Most of the other factors cited as advantages of DSLRs are now moot:

  • Image quality. Full frame mirrorless cameras from Sony promise as good or better image quality than the best DSLRs.

  • Lens quality / bokeh. Mirrorless bodies allow the widest selection of lenses from different formats to be adapted, in some cases (Metabones for Canon AF) allowing AF and aperture control from the camera body. Adaptor horror stories courtesy of LensRentals etc. mostly apply to wide angle infinity focus use cases, not portraiture.

There are some advantages to mirrorless bodies as well. In addition to lens adaptability, contrast detect autofocus using the main sensor has been shown to be far more consistent and accurate than phase detection in DSLRs, at least in good light. And features such as eye detection (the next step from face detection) take the trial and error out of shallow DOF headshots.

As for the question of "looking professional" a big lens always helps and a more compact body will make the lens appear bigger. I think provided you have a viewfinder you should be all right a vertical grip is helpful too. As is how you act, having to check the focus using the rear screen after every frame isn't going to inspire confidence in the client.

share|improve this answer
But you can also use CD AF via Live View with a DSLR. You have a choice between the two with the DSLR. –  Michael Clark Oct 25 '13 at 15:34
add comment

I don't know much about the current state of the art with mirrorless, but while a lot of things can eventually be compensated for (such as sensor size, PDAF capability (with hybrid AF chips, lens and strobe compatibility, etc), one thing that they can't do is give you an actual direct, through the lens image path.

A mirrorless can only ever show you what the sensor can see, never what is actually there. Anything that extends beyond the range of what the sensor sees won't be visible to you and that can have an impact on shot composition. Starting out, it might be nice to be able to see things how the sensor sees it to know exactly how it will come out, but once you have some experience, it is nice to be able to see what is actually there to know what you are and aren't capturing.

Battery life may also be another factor depending on the shooting environment. Mirrorless has to run the LCD, so it gets much less battery life than a DSLR can get when using the viewfinder, particularly if you get good at not having to spend a lot of time checking photos.

Room for dedicated buttons is also nice. It is just a convenience thing if you have time, but time you don't keep the customer waiting is time that the customer gets to keep and time you can spend working with another client, so it does have a benefit to both you and your customers.

There is also of course the "professional" look of a DSLR that shouldn't be underestimated when it comes to marketing yourself either. If you want to do commercial work, having people think your gear is big and fancy and expensive is almost if not more important than the actual quality and cost of your gear. This gap may also close, but having customers feel like they are getting their monies worth and that it isn't something they could have done with a point and shoot and a tripod is valuable for customer satisfaction.

share|improve this answer
I would think that for customers, portrait models, it is more about the professionalism of the photographer than his/her gear. Photographer's manners, speech, even outlooks, convey the message "Trust me, I know what I'm doing." But, it may be, sometimes intimidating gear is needed to speak for the photographer. –  Esa Paulasto Dec 3 '13 at 22:45
@EsaPaulasto - professionalism does matter. Equipment won't save you if you don't have professionalism, but if you are shooting on something that looks like their uncle's point and shoot (to a laymen), they start wondering why they didn't have their uncle take photos. –  AJ Henderson Dec 3 '13 at 23:30
add comment

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.