Evening

by w.hrybok

submit your photo


Hall of Fame
View past winners from this year

Please participate in Meta
and help us grow.

Take the 2-minute tour ×
Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I plan on going to Yosemite in December and am looking at getting a wide angle lens. I am thinking about investing in the Tamron AF 28-300 mm f3.5-6.3 XR Di LD VC Aspherical (IF) Macro Zoom lens. Model A20E. What do you think? Is there a better less expensive lens for my Canon Rebel T3i?

share|improve this question
3  
Note that on a Canon Rebel, 28mm is not wide-angle; it is in the range of "normal". –  mattdm Sep 2 '13 at 17:29
3  
Do you want a wide angle lens or a lens with a wide focal range? –  Michael Clark Sep 2 '13 at 19:08
    
The Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM is one of the best options for a wide angle on the T3i. The Canon EF 17-40mm f/4 L USM is also a great option but not as wide. –  dpollitt Sep 2 '13 at 19:55
    
As someone who owns both, for an APS-C body I would choose the Tamron AF 17-50mm f/2.8 DI II over the EF 17-40mm f/4 L. –  Michael Clark Sep 3 '13 at 2:44

3 Answers 3

It depends on exactly how wide-angle you want to go and how flexible you need the lens to be to zoom in to longer focal lengths as well.

If you want to go really wide, then the Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 is a well regarded lens but at $650 it is a little pricey. The Sigma 10-20mm f/4-5.6 EX DC is a couple of hundred cheaper, and just about as good at the apertures you would typically use to do landscape photos. The Tamron AF 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 Di II is another lens to consider at just a few more bucks than the Sigma. The-Digital-Picture.com has a nice summary comparing the differences between each of these lenses as well as a couple of others at the end of the review for each of them.

If you don't need to go quite that wide, then a lens in the 17-5omm range will give you a fairly wide short end and much more reach into normal focal length range as well. Again, the Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS is well regarded but pricey. The Tamron AF 17-50mm f/2.8 Di II is less than half the price and very close to the Canon in optical quality. Both these lenses, which only work on APS-C cameras like your T3i, are a little better optically than the EF 17-40mm f/4L that is priced about halfway between the two but projects a larger image circle that will also work on full frame camera bodies.

Update: On 9/3/2013 Canon dropped the suggested retail prices of several lenses. Included in the list were both Canon lenses mentioned above. The 17-55 has dropped from $1,049 to $879 USD, the 10-22 has dropped from $749 to $659 USD. Amazon had already dropped the price of the 10-22. The price of the 17-55 via amazon has now been dropped as well.

share|improve this answer
    
Regarding the 17mm to 40/50/55mm lenses, the 17-55's Image Stabilisation is especially useful if you're not planning on taking a tripod. It's a really versatile lens if you can afford it and don't want to get into the "ultra wide" range (10mm is a huge FOV). –  drfrogsplat Sep 3 '13 at 7:18
    
I had the sigma 10-20, but sold it after adding a canon 15-85 to my inventory. its an overal much sharper lens, has IS and a great range. Because 15mm is still pretty wide , you could take it into consideration. –  SirLenz0rlot Sep 4 '13 at 12:30

I've been to Yosemite many a time. with 28-135mm USM IS, and sigma 10-20mm HSM. Superzooms are not worth it. It is not possible to get a wide angle (below 28mm) and a tele (above approx 85mm) with the same lens element combination without too many sacrifices. If I had known about Sigma 17-50 F2.8 OS HSM, I would have gotten that.

The 28-135mm USM IS lens:

Yosemite Yosemite2

The 10-20mm HSM:

wideangle

Note that these are "linked" from facebook, so they already took a performance hit and back then I didnt shoot raw, so edits have been made from jepg to jpeg (also a performance hit).

share|improve this answer

This is a general purpose lens and not a particularly wide angle lens. It isn't a bad lens, but it also isn't a particularly great lens. The longer the focal length range of a lens, the more compromises have to be made in terms of image quality. The 28-300 shouldn't ever have to come off your camera, but it also won't do the best job for the price for any particular photo.

If you want a wide angle lens for an APS-C sized camera (such as your T3i) you really want something in the 14-28 mm range, maybe going as far up as 40 or 55, but you don't really want to go too far into the standard zoom range before compromises start having to be made in the optics.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.